Re: [v6ops] PD to hosts [was: DAD again [was: draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability discussion] ]

Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-3@u-1.phicoh.com> Tue, 17 November 2015 10:57 UTC

Return-Path: <pch-bBB316E3E@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EEEE1A8AF1 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 02:57:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1QtptJtgvfWl for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 02:57:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (stereo6.hq.phicoh.net [IPv6:2001:888:1044:10:2a0:c9ff:fe9f:17a9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F7A01A8AEC for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 02:57:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (localhost [::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by stereo.hq.phicoh.net with esmtp (Smail #91) id m1Zydwa-0000GYC; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 11:57:00 +0100
Message-Id: <m1Zydwa-0000GYC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
From: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-3@u-1.phicoh.com>
Sender: pch-bBB316E3E@u-1.phicoh.com
References: <m1ZyNBq-0000HnC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832F4CF07@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <m1ZyNyc-0000EoC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832F4CFA6@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <m1ZyS3J-0000CGC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832F4D4C5@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 16 Nov 2015 23:09:09 +0000 ." <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832F4D4C5@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 11:56:55 +0100
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/X7nzzSwpo4-JlqqyZpOEDaPCsjM>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] PD to hosts [was: DAD again [was: draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability discussion] ]
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 10:57:07 -0000

Hi Fred,

>Yes, you are right; the target address will be the link-local address of
>N on the eth0 link, and the destination address will be A. So, to the
>outside world, N would look like a router. Do you see a problem
>with that?

The problem is that other hosts will clear their destination caches if they
receive a NA without the router bit set. So a host trying to communicate 
with an address taken from the prefix will constantly go back to the default
router, get a redirect, do a neighbor discovery probe and clear the
destination cache for that address.

Maybe all nodes that receive a prefix using PD have to behave as routers for the
purposes of (at least) ND.