Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings
"Brzozowski, John" <John_Brzozowski@comcast.com> Mon, 17 July 2017 08:14 UTC
Return-Path: <John_Brzozowski@comcast.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6EC413179D for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 01:14:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9qtAIdrAZmwB for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 01:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vaadcmhout01.cable.comcast.com (vaadcmhout01.cable.comcast.com [96.114.28.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C45E131798 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 01:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 60721c4b-733ff70000000a8e-fc-596c71c4a938
Received: from VAADCEX11.cable.comcast.com (vaadcmhoutvip.cable.comcast.com [96.115.73.56]) (using TLS with cipher AES256-SHA256 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by vaadcmhout01.cable.comcast.com (SMTP Gateway) with SMTP id A6.F0.02702.4C17C695; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 04:13:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from VAADCEX09.cable.comcast.com (147.191.102.76) by VAADCEX11.cable.comcast.com (147.191.102.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 04:13:55 -0400
Received: from VAADCEX09.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe12:e2a0]) by VAADCEX09.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe12:e2a0%19]) with mapi id 15.00.1293.002; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 04:13:55 -0400
From: "Brzozowski, John" <John_Brzozowski@comcast.com>
To: Noah <noah@neo.co.tz>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
CC: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Jim Martin <jim@daedelus.com>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings
Thread-Index: AQHS/tSiyacM1/hfIEykN3ouQq0Z3w==
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 08:13:55 +0000
Message-ID: <0FAF1E05-DA4B-47BF-95F7-7EFCD1BED9B0@cable.comcast.com>
References: <7643C1DC-76A3-4652-9BB1-D0D42801F37E@consulintel.es> <CAEqgTWYOe=jWp=zVZNLx6DjKjNpPTYaq2jmjryudrGZHKZNq6g@mail.gmail.com> <A5D0385C-F755-4B44-86D8-6E618E77193F@consulintel.es> <CAPt1N1kroh2cPkTr8HRfNjLTdG0hkC1oQsUZdhQzQA5tA9-xug@mail.gmail.com> <9AF791E9-1E12-425E-93A4-2913E2D18CBA@consulintel.es> <CAPt1N1kU4cpVCsp7W3XNAZupYqjTWVH+BNp9bwtznnWD_uP2oQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAEqgTWZzZW0wKggDXjY=-aMfDxzd5-GoRqju1829XwY3aHQuYg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEqgTWZzZW0wKggDXjY=-aMfDxzd5-GoRqju1829XwY3aHQuYg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.21.0.170409
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [96.115.73.253]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_0FAF1E05DA4B47BF95F77EFCD1BED9B0cablecomcastcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Forward
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA11UfUwbZRzOe9ePo+N1t4O2L5WhNHGZ0zEwZjb4sbmQWGPQTRa10wSOcqMd pa13LQOdERcrpCxxH+Bct8WFMfcRlAVQQIVAV8mYIwIa9iGLY+ICROfIJgjq8N67Kxz+8/Z3 z/P7/Z7nnr45imRuGiyU2xvgeC/rseoMmgLhedvab9/0ODKvH8myHbz4L7BNjl/R24ZjpO23 xhhh290V1thuhiYIW+xsv9b2XW8nuZGy3x2bIOzhqR8I++6BT/X2jsg1vb2hYZawTx4bBPa6 Q4eB/czIXe1mapvhqSLO4y7j+HXPFBhcVbF9wH/9Q1B+vqVRVwmmakAYJFCIfhz9+uXPujAw UAzdRqBb1R2k/NAN0MjVP7XyQx9Ac51NOjyio9ej1p6f9LhOpp9Ac03dBG4i6R8Baq+fJzCR RL+MZi4OauWmPNT2wR1lIANNt9yTtDX0Q2j/1+MaXEM6B+3trCVktX4S/VM9IKkl0FvQcPSy tAjQJjRzoVESIGkzujr2CSG/BI0avvmelGsjmvjlntRvFMWGb5/WyPijqP/SmPLSmeiLE10K no66bp8SZylxZzEKv8/LflagvkNjSosZnYu1a/eClIhKObI4EVFNyPDDqOmrdXJ3OqqtGdXL 9WoUOnJUqbNR57k5oO45BqgzIK2MZYucpS5fMJCZleFkCz1chtNX6mSFAP5tBvjq8KkvtIPP Z5+LApoC1kR4Mt/jYLRsmVBRGgUlFGE1wkFdiYO5r9BXVOFiBVc+H/RwgjUZ5njETrgAFwY9 JVYLfNYvokkLqJfbKXi4gHhXrWmwHi8yL3BCUPC7nW5fUMgP8p4oQBQprt2Th9cWsRVvcbxP FouC+ymN1QxXdexwMHQxG+BKOM7P8XF2J0VZETyFlVfwXDFXvt3tCcRpce6vR0SGVjOS2ZXQ FnM7GJOaUPlNh09i2qKm/2+ZoBKioJhKFH2/48O+BT9bKriLFekkmFAqoolxVJJNgSHslImD KsmV8BW9GJEpTi2VuwCOAiry8ew0QTVLZ+vf52cIKiqdvfhkNF6fl7OY4VasQOM1rqB3IQqL CfZtKXAwy1UEtmRJhXswblThi64sD8JxzKao2KXG4t+gSeAU71ASbMbqieIXajEJBtZhcJkC SkEgWC39ZQqmyiEVOnAORoVZqjYpBk6IgSflSoEH2IA68JFcKXAFVQIfypUCV8AlgR/ElClO LVWyVILQvh2Zf4S3ze/v2fDaKKo6kb06m37R6N7+wEe9yf6sVzdMk8dr6t4wv9T62bub3o7k s85dLXdGO+dG+GW186uymbT6G0PHl79+o+eS29H4e9/6yltTVzafzgu9t5E4axioeqyhrcaw tXyNdf7w5acrTm46AEztBTNrh67V7goxIao7kGPVCC42aw3JC+x/G+jKMvkFAAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/XBproOmt3p2gQL4rKhB4Zk9U9zk>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 08:14:01 -0000
Agree with Noah and Ted. Note the I-D explicitly documents that a fallback, dual stack SSID must remain available as Noah mentions below. I fail to see how doing this will harm or discriminate. We do need to eat our own dogfood, otherwise we are hypocrites. John +1-484-962-0060 From: v6ops <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Noah <noah@neo.co.tz> Date: Monday, July 17, 2017 at 09:01 To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, v6ops <v6ops@ietf.org>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Jim Martin <jim@daedelus.com>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings FWIW and to cater for all, would a fallback dual stack SSID work for the status quo while this 2nd v6 SSID is also experimented upon which is a great idea considering this is IETF. Noah On 17 Jul 2017 9:54 a.m., "Ted Lemon" <mellon@fugue.com<mailto:mellon@fugue.com>> wrote: I don't think this is a social justice issue. Does the IETF think that IPv6 works, or not? If we think it works, and we have been working for what, 20 years, to make it work, and we have designed all this great transition tech, then why on earth would we not want to use it? This isn't "one draft." This is roughly half the work of the IETF for the past two decades. On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 8:51 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es<mailto:jordi.palet@consulintel.es>> wrote: So we agree to change the rules so that we use this network for every ID that want to experiment with it? Otherwise we discriminate among different authors … I think is a really bad precedent. Regards, Jordi -----Mensaje original----- De: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com<mailto:mellon@fugue.com>> Responder a: <mellon@fugue.com<mailto:mellon@fugue.com>> Fecha: lunes, 17 de julio de 2017, 8:48 Para: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es<mailto:jordi.palet@consulintel.es>> CC: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org<mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>>, Jim Martin <jim@daedelus.com<mailto:jim@daedelus.com>>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com<mailto:randy@psg.com>>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com<mailto:suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com<mailto:housley@vigilsec.com>>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in<mailto:alissa@cooperw.in>> Asunto: Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings I don't actually know what the goal of the IETF network is other than to provide connectivity. Because of the vicissitudes of hotel topology, it is often the case that IETF participants experience issues with the network at least once or twice per IETF despite the best efforts (and they are quite exceptional) of the NOC team. I do not really see what the damage is that you are hoping to protect against here. Users who don't read the NOC announcement? No sympathy. Sorry. ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.consulintel.es The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited. _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list v6ops@ietf.org<mailto:v6ops@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list v6ops@ietf.org<mailto:v6ops@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
- [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi… Brzozowski, John
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… joel jaeggli
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Noah
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Noah
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Brzozowski, John
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Jen Linkova
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Jen Linkova
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Mark Elkins
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… David Schinazi
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Stephen Honlue
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Jen Linkova
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Tore Anderson
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… David Schinazi
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… David Schinazi
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… David Schinazi
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Tore Anderson
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Noah
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Brzozowski, John
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Brzozowski, John
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Brzozowski, John
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Noah
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Dmitry Burkov
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Jen Linkova
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Tim Chown
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… David Schinazi
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Jen Linkova
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Jen Linkova
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Jen Linkova
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Jen Linkova
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Erik Nygren
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Ca By
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Ca By
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Simon Hobson
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Simon Hobson
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Lee Howard
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Erik Kline
- [v6ops] NAT64/DNS64 support in RIPE Atlas Tore Anderson
- Re: [v6ops] NAT64/DNS64 support in RIPE Atlas Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only W… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] NAT64/DNS64 support in RIPE Atlas Gert Doering