Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-servin-v6ops-monitor-ds-ipv6

Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net> Sat, 13 July 2013 13:46 UTC

Return-Path: <aservin@lacnic.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE73A21F92A5 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 06:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yZR7G+7+VY-T for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 06:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:4000::3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F7321F99CF for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 06:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Arturos-MacBook-Pro.local (unknown [IPv6:2800:af:ba30:f0e1:19ac:b741:e6fe:647d]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9D830847F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 10:46:08 -0300 (UYT)
Message-ID: <51E15A35.2090603@lacnic.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 10:46:29 -0300
From: Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <201307131245.r6DCj0d01032@ftpeng-update.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <201307131245.r6DCj0d01032@ftpeng-update.cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-From: aservin@lacnic.net
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-servin-v6ops-monitor-ds-ipv6
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 13:46:35 -0000

Hi,

    We have sent this draft about considerations and recommendations to
monitor IPv6 and dual-stack networks and services. We have been talking
with people deploying IPv6 and we have found that not all monitor their
networks and not many monitor them properly. We also found some
challenges in monitor implementations that not fully support IPv6
monitoring technologies (snmp, netflow, ipfix, ipv6 transport). Even
though monitoring v6 networks is as critical as doing it in v4, we have
not found many documents explaining how that has to be done (at least
guides with free access or up to date).

    There are also some misconceptions about monitoring IPv6, for
example SNMPv3 != SNMP+IPv6, or that you cannot collect IPv6 data and
send them on IPv4 that we wanted to clarify.

     We collected some recommendations from informal conversations with
people during some training and NOGs meeting during this year but we
need some more input. We will be sharing this draft with other forums to
get more inputs but we wanted to share it here first.

Best wishes,
Arturo and Mariela

On 7/13/13 9:45 AM, fred@cisco.com wrote:
> A new draft has been posted, at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-servin-v6ops-monitor-ds-ipv6. Please take a look at it and comment.
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops