Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis-04.txt
"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Fri, 22 August 2014 17:45 UTC
Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655901A06C4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 10:45:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -115.169
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-115.169 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0f1jt49P4t3R for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 10:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B2C41A067F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 10:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2764; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1408729523; x=1409939123; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=t5n5vWFcDkVphKlZhpbSba1Cb98hUsReaH2hP4R6juk=; b=FUr2LUkRaZdrGXWH5yuS36A1NgZGZkkccqI54m3wFYB5Xw/5voOTzZfh 4XbuITXFVefE5W/6GMlddIHMBEUEB/avZpaV7g5pODB2KahYYP/iiWOKp iqZRDDtJhk0iX/YsgY5CeH5xgDVVy2hT+fAbqjFpJbW+dKoYMVc2VhD2E U=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 195
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjwFALuA91OtJV2R/2dsb2JhbABZgw1TUwQEzFAMh0oBgRAWd4QEAQEDAQEBAWsbAgEIRicLJQIEEwkFiCwICAXEXhePU4MvgR0FkSaCA4FKXIZ6gViTNINebIFIgQcBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,382,1406592000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="349552280"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Aug 2014 17:45:22 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com [173.37.183.84]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7MHjMoF005643 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:45:22 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.15]) by xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([173.37.183.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:45:22 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis-04.txt
Thread-Index: AQHPvjDY5s20XJbymUCUCEDxyvex9w==
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:45:21 +0000
Message-ID: <E08C6EA9-7F05-401D-9D41-95F710D5AC5C@cisco.com>
References: <20140821141108.29977.74861.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140821141108.29977.74861.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.114]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D9ADE8E4-BAEC-4D74-9E37-5FFAFBA18B58"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/XJ9HGDMZwYyLuvTtFKGX9JpxP7U
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis-04.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:45:25 -0000
Gang Chen has been following up on the list discussion, and thinks this addresses all of the comments on the list. Are there any remaining issues, or shall I send this in? Fred On Aug 21, 2014, at 7:11 AM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Operations Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : IPv6 Roaming Behavior Analysis > Authors : Gang Chen > Hui Deng > Dave Michaud > Jouni Korhonen > Mohamed Boucadair > Vizdal Ales > Filename : draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis-04.txt > Pages : 19 > Date : 2014-08-21 > > Abstract: > This document identifies a set of failure cases that may be > encountered by IPv6-enabled mobile customers in roaming scenarios. > The analysis reveals that the failure causes include improper > configurations, incomplete functionality support in equipment, and > inconsistent IPv6 deployment strategies between the home and the > visited networks. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis/ > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis-04 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis-04 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > v6ops@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
- [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming… internet-drafts
- Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roa… Fred Baker (fred)