IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 464XLAT Trial Deployment Report

Victor Kuarsingh <victor.kuarsingh@gmail.com> Mon, 06 February 2012 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <victor.kuarsingh@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A780821F84C5 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 08:02:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dUwLFJPf40LP for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 08:02:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com (mail-we0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 740A121F844C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 08:02:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by werm10 with SMTP id m10so5398809wer.31 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:02:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=jDJeiUy9gkzz/aom1HquonnLXDJBNIV2OsS6wGCBSSs=; b=DDT7aphhfgoXuN68cbecsFDRKm5iznHXK7LRH/2907wUEF6ZCN1ola5b/VLom2rZWx TxrKVcJxQ7ck9a4yDXT1WYnikNagVCIomIkx2Sp7xNaJXhd2xorKpJoierX6rQP6fhmp VHvBRZWAAYZhDnQorYzD1HS2Knapx1dsVfuGw=
Received: by 10.216.134.37 with SMTP id r37mr7359292wei.38.1328544173710; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:02:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.110] (a50.fluent.fr. [195.68.67.50]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y6sm13909006wix.10.2012.02.06.08.02.50 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:02:52 -0800 (PST)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.0.0.100825
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:02:46 +0100
From: Victor Kuarsingh <victor.kuarsingh@gmail.com>
To: Congxiao Bao <cx.cernet@gmail.com>, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Message-ID: <CB55B7E1.14C3B%victor.kuarsingh@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Fwd: 464XLAT Trial Deployment Report
In-Reply-To: <CABv173W+pyZ36v0eTNzDAnmc_FJ5vGq7cewjnkajMp-+LwaZYg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3411392569_6247434"
Cc: v6ops v6ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 464XLAT Trial Deployment Report
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:02:57 -0000


From:  Congxiao Bao <cx.cernet@gmail.com>

> Hi
> I think 464 XLAT can work for the cases where scalability and user tracking
ability are not so critical, since it uses stateful XLAT in Core and stateless
XLAT in > > CPE, not stateless double translation for both Core and CPE.
 
> support it adopted by WG as an experimental document.
>Congxiao

+1.  I  agree this work has value.

Regards,

Victor K

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email