IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] [sunset4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sunset4-gapanalysis-09.txt

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 17 August 2017 16:46 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0A51321BF; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eqqh75s2A6Ya; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x233.google.com (mail-oi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B19AD132055; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x233.google.com with SMTP id g131so72070443oic.3; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=/V2d7MsnYemaiYJBcvj8gehRaLGhLMKQ9THCPOsE0Tc=; b=E+BIdHrxCHOoA0steNa+6phgsIIXzDkUcfB/N5Z9Oaan2QKPoLD6lXQs5+paoHHK4I axgt3p1YO3/GUsVbwojN0Ucl1S+39n/LDGwBUGA84FZB/IvuvQciGM5Vn0UUZrMO0DFU /H0kLmrRtcWSR+WK/mSnjbYUuyAl3iEkE/dtg0vltY6+TWTr95r2a3PIwWAf1z+GvHqh 1VsjvgIlmBLxa6JIc7eRoytg8Ka+TiJnrcFOotl0mEwsCBxGUncfvSSNUPYJJ89VSZ2d qMDm61R+xCES8GmlxO3dXcH6B4JghzzYhz0zB+MB0LTqQHeBOC66mrHwKS13Rt+zIB5L W6VQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=/V2d7MsnYemaiYJBcvj8gehRaLGhLMKQ9THCPOsE0Tc=; b=q+GNbyDvFGb83q7/lMSTFs7dRdyOS5mV7+PXKgeq932hkqZA6XjptXCHgOlv3QqqML gnjyn/kSihFqKJRy5mMYd/zhPYXACriF/C4i/3vjAbXINKiZcq8LCjfjRTQZdz003IwX +fO0e1B60FVe404RqmfJw+LaIRqvIDeMK0FivHV09nQ4/AJZ0LgdXn4z0syijysWE/wv aYmjaPm3gKkYbvyL6GSLaOnHK641boeU8Kmu+oijEF/U3QR+l+QMJdWjsOe0Kxz3VCs8 7CAkiV/vxZ9mLsKqMCDEUdvLuj3FjmeOc7OKs7WdKvU0DsFWqkmYQQQ7baz3wUHZPREg Z9Fw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5i4rdP1Ivj+5cBmamye3s5wadJE1wVaGW+mEH/dgn6QDRJtMZZ/ zeoTk461TGv11w==
X-Received: by 10.202.74.68 with SMTP id x65mr7677263oia.316.1502988380169; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8802:5600:1e::1281? ([2600:8802:5600:1e::1281]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 82sm4564290oib.57.2017.08.17.09.46.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.0 \(3445.1.3\))
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <D5BB3045.8138C%lee@asgard.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:46:17 -0700
Cc: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "sunset4@ietf.org" <sunset4@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <034F179A-7D3D-41DA-AC94-2634AD404BC0@gmail.com>
References: <150158713179.9574.7767168468574012763@ietfa.amsl.com> <C9B5F12337F6F841B35C404CF0554ACB8AD0B6CC@dggeml509-mbx.china.huawei.com> <D5B9D8F6.811AD%lee@asgard.org> <B5B97D89-D2FF-4A6D-BE11-E1C1DC62EA16@consulintel.es> <0E0D8D4F-A487-4572-A7D2-C77635280329@gmail.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DC00555@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <D5BB3045.8138C%lee@asgard.org>
To: Lee Howard <Lee@asgard.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.1.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/XWOE6V8kTSM9BCFEz9-NGYbadO4>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [sunset4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sunset4-gapanalysis-09.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 16:46:22 -0000


> On Aug 17, 2017, at 8:41 AM, Lee Howard <Lee@asgard.org> wrote:
> 
> I will argue to both working groups that we should find an
> operator who thinks this is a good idea. I hope we can get them to write
> it up. If there is no such operator, we should remove the section (or at
> most, footnote it as an idea somebody once thought of).

IIRC, Terastream looked at the idea a few years ago and eventually dropped it. They might be interested to say what their thought processes were - pro and con.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email