Re: [v6ops] Flash renumbering

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Fri, 18 September 2020 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 174513A11D4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hcZU-q5OlsAv for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe31.google.com (mail-vs1-xe31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 720613A11D3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe31.google.com with SMTP id y194so4012298vsc.4 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fz8phNOaKrYRcg4KlMAd5OL3LgnPRu3WWAFvoe/o8N4=; b=rofHt5ZRMRm2FRCKLcETQRfiOfLwtOYNOSG8XY4jKxhU+X3HC78Sr+fAAOJ+CJzjtz Gs6QW9PhgqHMAxmbJWd/by7LewNtK0r8YOZ1sBhMI9JrM+lHOJtbDTltYPEM2MC7g7e1 l1c5JFVwncP5jedOPHZZHagv2EElY8XBzOt0TAOozDW59UGUAkLIqiPkBhdzAyPy1K2f ANWrvl299U16eYW3tweirIOCDHjKK58Jif1XagNHIwwjflF1G/Ozpym6EOQ8jZUGNSjO +8NzdSRamip+nRovzlkGVb3NsLrSWuYN7lNb8H3ajv9wEIM4FKuAGrn5h7sYlQyCz9ib Vhmg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fz8phNOaKrYRcg4KlMAd5OL3LgnPRu3WWAFvoe/o8N4=; b=Gy5mjkCgoxjn3nLr2OY09WRedoo3LEfAf8VGAH/ommmUlXk4Z5QIJWyIuNolb9qRJl n9kHN9C6nfrA+TuN19byvZw2T7OZxTumwJ0Add1SWYacIIfDEj2rQ7Df4+Htsondik5n 0u5uUshVJNF8yt+jsf1xmsojlZTwqQSFNJxT55J+iu3+Bn8J59YDyf+LIqb/Zqn2kJip ZxygAWCHYkoyFJ13FQSKxb7qiZrF8pTKcDnhEDvocymKvGiOn9SzG9sFC/oGWZdYURFr hsAjvO4vk+H8fXk4KAe7PA2RVaFs2o+aBSug+Iiv07HTg+eI/tPJI+wq9JpTBloAhi+T LuSA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530yS2u+V9HRixDIb4Zt5++wbCGlO7Onn84z+PrCE5ESXfrB7HTV MvT447qDi3uHWeMjs9UATOXn5QKthJMXoSQtjfc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyQ8UxHXmbqVQxjuWgFlPypNsMsW2DovwhDZ1YYttokTdXUzBB2THOwm71AjmmO4PWmv8qeog0I3V6RtUop/Bs=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:e248:: with SMTP id w8mr11960267vse.33.1600449121342; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <8f964b8650cd4b619ff47aed5b07bc67@huawei.com> <7ef6cbcc-164f-383c-658b-b3c0df859535@go6.si> <1af87e24-1410-8f89-b50d-9c61694e4644@foobar.org> <f97b7ac2-0b36-2fae-58fd-eddee6f8b408@gmail.com> <76f10fa7030044c4a0b71443fde92f24@huawei.com> <CAHL_VyC7u7bNJD9pUzbFTrBtifbCVmQtPn4YHHs5g7T6omKwLQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHL_VyC7u7bNJD9pUzbFTrBtifbCVmQtPn4YHHs5g7T6omKwLQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:11:50 -0400
Message-ID: <CABNhwV17OQsfPoxz-xfyuv7wQMq3LRye8GJC95vUyV8cnkQ-Jg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Richard Patterson <richard@helix.net.nz>
Cc: Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005bd70005af9999b9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Xaoclijk33TDp9n9SWDgaakBmNo>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Flash renumbering
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:12:04 -0000

All

I really still feel this use case being Broadband provider PD related stale
prefix issue  is really a corner case for SOHO users as it does not impact
enterprises with manually configured stable prefix which is 100% of the
enterprise dual stack use case.

>From an operations impact there is considerable monetary impact to
enterprises if the IPv6 standards change proposed by flash renumbering
 does not take into account the  enterprise stable prefix scenario that
does not fall into this one size fits all bucket being proposed.

I am worried about adverse effects of the changes being proposed to SLAAC
standard that could impact enterprises.  We just need to be very careful
that every used case out there is accounted for.

Gyan

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 11:56 AM Richard Patterson <richard@helix.net.nz>
wrote:

> On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 08:05, Vasilenko Eduard <
> vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Brian,
>>
>>
>> > SLAAC is only one of the victims of flash renumbering. (If there was
>> more
>>
>>
>> > widespread use of ULAs that might not be true.)
>>
>>
>> [Ed: ] But How? Subscriber needs access to Global Internet.
>>
>>
>> Is it possible to connect Google by ULA?
>
>
> Well if ULAs were used more often for local connectivity, they wouldn't be
> impacted by an outage of the WAN interface causing the GUA prefix to change.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> v6ops mailing list
>
> v6ops@ietf.org
>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>
> --

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *



*M 301 502-134713101 Columbia Pike *Silver Spring, MD