IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call- "harmfully broad"?

James Woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com> Wed, 11 February 2015 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <jhw@nestlabs.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236DC1A1A79 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:51:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v9ifpcKcNp-J for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:51:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-f52.google.com (mail-oi0-f52.google.com [209.85.218.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 947231A1A0B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:51:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-f52.google.com with SMTP id u20so19591479oif.11 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:51:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=IdWjOIQ1cPuQywRdKZ78oVka1bnJI3FYdFD5WOpqyLw=; b=lhDIf5Klg4/ACSRLhoWU+7ZzM6rRXRZ8oScoXerQHuGHkLxZ5JAgK8hS4g+O81mDlj JQNHXmp3GooSa0+kVO/XHIz5CX+ffR4hqdW2/K6ylhLveRQk50h3smXrFEauk6j0hTsz 1TxIE8zpDDpxsGZkSAJsvIbPoETBQwADofcOsWvMiZDQbSwquC0HEFTUWC8FfoKcnSW5 cQfKv9qE9MtBETRuw1B0UsS41YBaV/Rhu2V9VJ4zNvMT33Q9KDHC/4uWy57/ro52gb9e t1UIPROLPWfLg3degbxhPZUEbKwPkP/AIE92hlTRnOttAjfr9ODsnQn9T/AiZFFumoEu SA7g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlTjXfosI2VdUUghKxb+fblWi1yjPGqwNpiLtUCuTpx7WJrB/0XOkcWd/cWoMFivD1UhXIh
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.176.34 with SMTP id cf2mr19853820oec.52.1423677087877; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:51:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.150.2 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:51:27 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330049091C2@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330049091C2@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:51:27 -0800
Message-ID: <CADhXe52o=Vxux1+G8_EXgE_-a3Mest_LD6Hzzqu=hDp3H++Ttw@mail.gmail.com>
From: James Woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e01182b88191e0f050ed3a72e"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/XhGDrgRcEaMOAbGxANLL75g1STs>
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call- "harmfully broad"?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:51:35 -0000

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 4:09 AM, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:

>
>
> Which items are not technically justified?
>

Others may have other items that bug them, and additional items may spring
to my mind later if I put my mind to it, but I see no technical
justification to recommend a simple firewall by default for tethered hosts
according to RFC 6092. I consider that recommendation to be actively
harmful.


-- 
james woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com>
Nest Labs, Communications Engineering

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email