Re: [v6ops] Revised Internet Drafts for allocation of IPv6 space for LISP EIDs

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Wed, 23 October 2013 15:29 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3057611E813A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 08:29:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y3-clyWur9dY for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 08:29:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2681511E81AF for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 08:29:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach-high.fuaim.com [206.197.161.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4A28810A; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 08:29:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 10252520.rudm1.ra.johnshopkins.edu (addr16212925014.ippl.jhmi.edu [162.129.250.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F07B136811A; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 08:29:42 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5267EB60.7080105@innovationslab.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:29:36 -0400
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
References: <28CFF7E5-E98E-4D97-B7F4-3A18C255253C@gigix.net> <D62C71FC-306F-4F91-97E2-84D6F64A58A3@istaff.org> <5267E96B.1000802@innovationslab.net> <20131023152549.GN50205@Space.Net>
In-Reply-To: <20131023152549.GN50205@Space.Net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="faGvBxbrnjjJkFdaWf3v9P8mBIDr6LEc7"
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Revised Internet Drafts for allocation of IPv6 space for LISP EIDs
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 15:29:48 -0000

Hi Gert,

On 10/23/13 11:25 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:21:15AM -0400, Brian Haberman wrote:
>>>     space and define the associated allocation framework.  Assignments
>>>     from this block may appear the in the BGP routing infrastructure.
>>
>> With no hat on... I don't think there is any "may" about their
>> appearance in BGP route tables.
> 
> So is this "will" or "MUST NOT"?

"Will" by my interpretation and based on discussions within the LISP WG.
 To quote http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-06#section-7

"In order to provide connectivity between the Legacy Internet and LISP
sites, PITRs announcing large aggregates (ideally one single large
aggregate) of the IPv6 EID Block could be deployed."

Regards,
Brian