Re: [v6ops] use of Teredo addresses in Apple devices
Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Fri, 24 July 2015 08:58 UTC
Return-Path: <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B21171A21B2 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 01:58:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.562
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.562 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DcrNZxli3NTo for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 01:58:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (givry.fdupont.fr [IPv6:2001:41d0:1:6d55:211:5bff:fe98:d51e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 672081A1BCC for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 01:58:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id t6O8uUI3080964; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:56:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <201507240856.t6O8uUI3080964@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:32:05 +0200. <alpine.DEB.2.02.1507241028300.11810@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:56:30 +0200
Sender: Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/XjuEfn2hWLu1L21B2zj_mFureyw>
Cc: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] use of Teredo addresses in Apple devices
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 08:58:18 -0000
In your previous mail you wrote: > Yes, I agree that PI would be optimal, but I am not opposed to using some > other prefix such as the one Stuart suggested. => these messages made me to look at the (nice) slides... I agree with this position (PI or Stuart's) (aka +1). Regards Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
- Re: [v6ops] use of Teredo addresses in Apple devi… Alexandru Petrescu
- [v6ops] use of Teredo addresses in Apple devices STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [v6ops] use of Teredo addresses in Apple devi… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] use of Teredo addresses in Apple devi… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] use of Teredo addresses in Apple devi… Francis Dupont
- Re: [v6ops] use of Teredo addresses in Apple devi… Edwin Cordeiro