Re: [v6ops] [dhcwg] IPv6-Only Preferred DHCPv4 option

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 05 December 2019 09:12 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B1C120108 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 01:12:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wojG1ZDkdsB6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 01:12:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x12b.google.com (mail-il1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AD7E120105 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 01:12:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id f6so2315461ilh.9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 01:12:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=V0MCgMYpj9JcQYwLPWEQh1ssyxvIsqD1oLYNZNjYEIY=; b=nXgAUiOZ8h2W+yBMCWAcqRYK6JFIkrM7SJuWmeJGujhRf3UnnUmG+DHqSqjWR5oVZm KkMdeKVFW9zNS5kv7g95HTypm9AITQ+/nkUZQd0TDGm4fn67SScz3qBPPnfDJLDfenlJ CB7fvAEyvHt+ZfLQPAO2gZw6rBcO8CDOdeFGjPjexT5ClN9H4CtbhvOhfC0IjtQjOUcs c5Y7F6Mzu0wsh0wIdHU0rZZ/UZS1byr6u/lM+yNdk+pnAsxvp9xh4IXtxz7LcaoPa7KD QjzMcMn8oK3sl8RhQ5hIrI4fqPzhmJOykZ5TDulUJBiBjbDaA1YKvWT0hAp+fQV1c5fG AizA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=V0MCgMYpj9JcQYwLPWEQh1ssyxvIsqD1oLYNZNjYEIY=; b=WQj7vNpPkDXDw/QwgF9VNmvMh1xR7QAu2n2gYBDY8BWzdnODs6esy1W6WxOOmho3OC IPdjdJn3Q8RUzXCsqMlVyZT444XFSTxLfUWvClMMp+gnPb75+zi5LO8jy6COwfYXO//i 1MWLit/SQMnE2SbW3uKOFaHNzr6OCDBIOe3oLB47W2AKESd/UaF/wRqwiQvuYz7QSiey ztG32aJNg8TY3m+axxNKoFHBywLb7uJBnALrCNp1FyfnYlVzh6gya7JD66EXPXtFdu/Q cg6jpvjzDC4tw+CYfTZRSfHA0MDx2jQl250ynp7Z3MWejqoyuaPEqViTOwwIStTi85IF K3tA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWrCjjJKf4/IZNktKFR6t7rziwZR2TiTyFar2d0v5Gx9iLONDVP baE5O2zgUBesbN+T8AskNXq6RZqhQ4B0zYgmbxyisg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy8y1eh6QD9wOr2lEy9zlyDe0jWhJlp00OtScjBuG9pDZJyQ5hO9T11VCuSOeQ5Kg3tksd8O6kPoUJMF24ejpw=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:8912:: with SMTP id n18mr7971573ild.241.1575537131133; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 01:12:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFU7BAR1JLUZps=CAqJfeQtUf-xQ88RYvgYrPCP+QP0Ter7YFg@mail.gmail.com> <8736e0gqu2.fsf@miraculix.mork.no> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330313E29BB@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAFU7BARiwGZohd5d-hqUUpH5jzjFerbLGcOBVc+S9BC3OYMFcw@mail.gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330313E41EE@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAKD1Yr2ZuCXWvRGi-hTj3g0A24WHr=ept9CqFx6_mP3vKUcaqA@mail.gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330313E429B@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330313E429B@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 18:11:59 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr0PKSyz3Ku6dw_-czqksB1tii_4Oc-9GqP9GG0HBzY+4Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Cc: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>, Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>, "draft-link-dhc-v6only@ietf.org" <draft-link-dhc-v6only@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000089f160598f1539f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Xu0enIAsc_5EAc9d7t5wbpygeiQ>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [dhcwg] IPv6-Only Preferred DHCPv4 option
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 09:12:14 -0000

On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 5:58 PM <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:

> IMO, a host will need to “pause” the v4 configuration for xxx ms to make
> sure the configuration (v4/v6) is consistent.
>

Hosts do not do this today, and I don't think they will start doing so. The
reason is that they cannot tell whether another protocol will start
working. If they wait xxx ms to make sure the other protocol comes up, they
are slowing down all connections to single-stack networks by xxx ms, making
their users unhappy.

Note that IPv6 has built-in delays in the protocol itself (DAD for the
link-local address; various randomized delays) that make it very difficult
to get anything done before at least 1-2 seconds have passed. Hosts that
know that 70% of networks are IPv4-only will not want to wait 1-2 seconds
to connect to those networks.

>