IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-gont-6man-slaac-renum

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Tue, 07 May 2019 08:52 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DAF712001B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2019 01:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HtHrHgkCvAuU for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2019 01:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bugle.employees.org (accordion.employees.org [198.137.202.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9F551200A2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 May 2019 01:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from astfgl.hanazo.no (77.16.61.110.tmi.telenormobil.no [77.16.61.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bugle.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F5C4FECC00E; Tue, 7 May 2019 08:52:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by astfgl.hanazo.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218AB14B684A; Tue, 7 May 2019 10:52:11 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\))
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR05MB42450ABFBEC5D340295E4266AE300@BYAPR05MB4245.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 10:52:10 +0200
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D92ABF9B-8572-493D-AF25-A4A2AD562AD8@employees.org>
References: <BYAPR05MB42450ABFBEC5D340295E4266AE300@BYAPR05MB4245.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.8)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/XyVmssFbiTX400NNn-kaL7c9qpU>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-gont-6man-slaac-renum
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 08:52:17 -0000

Ron,

> Each week between now and IETF 105, we will review and discuss one draft with an eye towards progressing it.
> 
> This week, please review and comment on draft-gont-6man-slaac-renum.

This document got lots of discussion and concerns raised in 6man/v6ops.
There was also a side meeting on it, in Bangkok (or Prague, it's all a blur to me)
Perhaps a start would be for the chairs/authors to summarise the issues already voiced?

Cheers,
Ole

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email