Re: [v6ops] RFC7934

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Wed, 19 July 2017 08:07 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B196D131C1D for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 01:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6YFrjJDk_N5j for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 01:07:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCA2813167A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 01:07:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id v6J87TrS005485; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 10:07:29 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id C0CCD20657B; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 10:07:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A917320652C; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 10:07:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [132.166.84.51] ([132.166.84.51]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v6J87TLS032418; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 10:07:29 +0200
To: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <596CF817.8040900@foobar.org> <CAFU7BAQ5h5dHKmDbOHo9+JCgo+WZpQmctf8F+_0OfJ0dV=tmww@mail.gmail.com> <ef9cc89d-8fbc-47c1-6955-0c005149b13c@gmail.com> <CAFU7BASSdp5+0DQr+7vusZ14YW3Zcu9se4x7zpt02-tNvVS_DQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <29e1e447-2dca-028f-87dc-6fab52ee4f00@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 10:07:28 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAFU7BASSdp5+0DQr+7vusZ14YW3Zcu9se4x7zpt02-tNvVS_DQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Y3BNpivULuqYkWkaucqheCTx-Eo>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] RFC7934
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 08:07:34 -0000


Le 19/07/2017 à 00:47, Jen Linkova a écrit :
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 4:47 AM, Alexandre Petrescu 
> <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Jen said:
>>> 
>>> I had to use all my imagination and still not sure how the phrase
>>> 'it is RECOMMENDED that the network give the host the ability to
>>> use new addresses without requiring explicit requests.' can be
>>> read as 'DHCPv6 is not recommended'.
>> 
>> 
>> Because SLAAC does not obtain addresses by using Requests.  That's
>> DHCP who uses Requests to obtain addresses.
> 
> Let me give you an example. Imagine that we have apples and oranges.
> Then I say: 'It is recommended that children are given apples every
> day'. Does it mean "giving children oranges is not recommended'? No.
> False. However the statement 'giving children oranges (and oranges
> ONLY) is not recommended' is true. See the difference? ;)

Give children 3 apples and oranges a day.

Alex

>