Re: [v6ops] Implementation Status of PREF64

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Wed, 13 October 2021 17:40 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF1E23A040A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:40:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=space.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iwRtqtsHF1uY for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gatekeeper1-relay.space.net (gatekeeper1-relay.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:3:85::38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5518A3A0869 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:40:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=space.net; i=@space.net; q=dns/txt; s=esa; t=1634146807; x=1665682807; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=8GMkhn6o1ifjaCyA/x57eiktopBS0jTdmNkrJ01cDMM=; b=J5kY1hgoD8Lr/KF8fTFJzr05ai58nH2FaIdJVuC+rtwM/0UEpYTIsATh 1IJ6V1qgMJvIDgaT11u9LBhfhlOWsnY1KbFDd0duaacJQ6Y2wGoHLotwg d1h5w5v3Ga0HCD0Zj/I+KHfLuQXz8yTXe65w5hm2w6RVr1i+l22CEwtU2 b7c3rIo9xDuAUcRfVvmc6biB0QPppbFKQS0ngJvZnCdpehmW7FcnETCEa U+Fp/+7Ojo4u3Jm9tRRcGDJ9Rdl0jvLA/3eaYzc21d98JlKnmbMHyOpMS f1F666MzZ/uzUkUsQgT0zSzuMoy+/q8uHCGMqiYhGlHckxPxYbh3RF+h8 g==;
X-SpaceNet-SBRS: None
Received: from mobil.space.net ([195.30.115.67]) by gatekeeper1-relay.space.net with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Oct 2021 19:40:03 +0200
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D4043988 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 19:40:02 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085D941202; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 19:40:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 024A7126D41; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 19:40:02 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 19:40:01 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Clark Gaylord <cgaylord@vt.edu>
Cc: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-10@u-1.phicoh.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, David Farmer <farmer=40umn.edu@dmarc.ietf.org>
Message-ID: <YWcZ8ROAmbjVLNUJ@Space.Net>
References: <1A6ED87B-666E-439C-852F-2E5C904C0515@delong.com> <CAKD1Yr23fY2DJDvB-9eVFRsxnBnZQ0kZuZfYUfRUHYW=_D=enA@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau1z0q0R61x7iY+Wg_cFRU0jmqr+fR0y=bSXxj+K-n722w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1T_mXfxJGHOrBfqZfexm6GTrUqnFi57710pTroKQK6uQ@mail.gmail.com> <702CB018-1A02-4B32-B9AA-7C7B31521F12@delong.com> <CAKD1Yr0jZR8Efzr_Y6FeiBvHYS8ATmDupx2ABTXXy-rSA_QjmA@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR02MB69249D4F0A8003E77EC9F153C3B19@DM6PR02MB6924.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <CAN-Dau0q7p-9NWv=9vouX51Z1Yqe_h06WwpnkMjkyj6=A7EcQw@mail.gmail.com> <m1mZfPJ-0000IoC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <CADzU5g7z2eQAfa2F4yJb512UGVNVz=7q5ne565XEmb1bztJNeQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADzU5g7z2eQAfa2F4yJb512UGVNVz=7q5ne565XEmb1bztJNeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/YDhaDzPaWJhvb0J_XY631qiLA5E>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Implementation Status of PREF64
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 17:40:11 -0000

Hi,

On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 05:04:39PM -0400, Clark Gaylord wrote:
> The predictability of assigned/managed addresses is less a problem for your
> arbitrary client/phone and more of an issue for the potential use case, for
> example, of IoT/instrumentation devices where the endpoints are perceived
> to need more active management than the typical phone.

And this is a typical role for an Android mobile device?

And this is so important that a general purpose mobile device can not do
IA_NA/IA_TA, because some special-purpose IoT hub would need something
else?

Not convincing,

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279