IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-yourtchenko-ra-dhcpv6-comparison-00.txt (fwd)

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Thu, 09 January 2014 11:56 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E021AE29B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 03:56:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aZ_J37EYjQAP for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 03:56:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og109.obsmtp.com (exprod7og109.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.171]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541E01AE29A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 03:56:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob109.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUs6OfqF6/IWPTMzhV84qIHzXBM5X0O4s@postini.com; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 03:56:47 PST
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C7841B82D7 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 03:56:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DDCA19005C; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 03:56:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vpna-132.vpn.nominum.com (192.168.1.10) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 03:56:46 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEmG1=rRYwJaZp3qYF47=263jFp+BLpF3H6PuS8+Fd6qinMT3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 06:56:42 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <71B4A0D3-B4F2-4B3C-B38E-ED7678BEA6FE@nominum.com>
References: <CAEmG1=rRYwJaZp3qYF47=263jFp+BLpF3H6PuS8+Fd6qinMT3g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.10]
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-yourtchenko-ra-dhcpv6-comparison-00.txt (fwd)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 11:56:57 -0000

On Jan 8, 2014, at 9:56 PM, Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com> wrote:
> 4 groups of hosts on the subnet;
> groupA, groupB, groupC, groupD;
> four different policies on the DHCP server.
> subnet has 4 different upstream routers.
> groupA is handed IP address on routerA as default gateway
> groupB is handed IP address on routerB as default gateway
> groupC is handed IP address on routerC as default gateway
> groupD is handed IP address on routerD as default gateway
> 
> all four groups are within the same L2 broadcast domain,
> and have applications that make use of that same-subnet
> relationship.

So is the problem you are trying to solve here essentially a cheap SDN solution?   Why not simply isolate the four groups of hosts onto four separate VLANs?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email