Re: [v6ops] SLAAC renum: Problem Statement & Operational workarounds

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Thu, 24 October 2019 13:34 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=1200212867=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD9C120840 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 06:34:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pofHXjWRayJv for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 06:34:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:495::5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B5BF12081D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 06:34:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1571924087; x=1572528887; i=jordi.palet@consulintel.es; q=dns/txt; h=User-Agent:Date: Subject:From:To:CC:Message-ID:Thread-Topic:References: In-Reply-To:Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; bh=pvEcGG9PQPWrqFhffN8oJQFop+MYxRZB6E9MF9V0+5Y=; b=UlUmld1YBu4pE p7NAXQdHP492eJ7t8rXn7ZYL50vbWkqA/t4debDjjupPWqYzygmZoD5EsfcEinYd WES85sfjnOQ6aI+lUTO+fhmalbwrdCXwHdpHbTkZKzqexV2+4egbTErMrjj+zPNu 7PiQrwLERQ4puHaCoxwsrXW3lSNu08=
X-MDAV-Result: clean
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Thu, 24 Oct 2019 15:34:47 +0200
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Thu, 24 Oct 2019 15:34:47 +0200
Received: from [10.10.10.144] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v16.5.2) with ESMTPA id md50006439544.msg for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 15:34:45 +0200
X-MDRemoteIP: 2001:470:1f09:495:d006:7d6a:d2aa:7e27
X-MDHelo: [10.10.10.144]
X-MDArrival-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 15:34:45 +0200
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Return-Path: prvs=1200212867=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: v6ops@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.f.191014
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 15:34:44 +0200
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
CC: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <2DAE4BF5-3D33-4DA2-A8E0-533468D1D317@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] SLAAC renum: Problem Statement & Operational workarounds
References: <m1iNIFE-0000IwC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <d1b6855d-bde9-7b53-4809-0846bb9772e4@si6networks.com> <CAO42Z2x7vudujw5t++obry56g=VNjQXXTHFK8pBPk0jmk78Bcg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJoHkZ8pTjszP0vw4BjX0HUhmPa6wJONzdy2JEm5iqAfBUvjRg@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2wCYi4KWTEz1hUSPVr9+hu8GaHRkPuvQQ2P00knvnPaaQ@mail.gmail.com> <848BA3B3-36B4-4C42-86D0-88759BC45D5A@employees.org> <A61279DA-4678-4A10-9117-6CA227AE2FA5@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <A61279DA-4678-4A10-9117-6CA227AE2FA5@cisco.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/YHGtbZvQogCWsJrOpn5qBxr99dY>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] SLAAC renum: Problem Statement & Operational workarounds
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 13:34:55 -0000

+1 !

Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
 
 

El 24/10/19 15:12, "v6ops en nombre de Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org en nombre de evyncke@cisco.com> escribió:

    Ole
    
    What about a "IPv6 renumbering considered harmful" or "Unstable DHCP-PD prefix considered harmful" ?
    
    -éric (enjoying my 3-year old /48 or is it 5 years?)
    
    
    On 24/10/2019, 12:47, "v6ops on behalf of Ole Troan" <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of otroan@employees.org> wrote:
    
        Mark,
        
        Right. Instant/flash renumbering is not supported in IP networks.
        IPv6 does nothing to help with this, well, assuming a network hiding behind NAT, it makes it harder.
        Apart from "does not work", what more can the IETF say or do here?
        
        Cheers,
        Ole
     
    
    _______________________________________________
    v6ops mailing list
    v6ops@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.