IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Proposed agenda

Cb B <cb.list6@gmail.com> Sun, 16 February 2014 00:52 UTC

Return-Path: <cb.list6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEAB31A0310 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:52:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 684LCGd0ZPmM for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:52:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com (mail-we0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15B3C1A0305 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:52:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t61so9827990wes.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:52:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=TtJlOKDAVAbdJbwybq7Jf6hD9XQVibca4jplbdhhPoo=; b=t2zBsEhOMWXGDT+sd65LzQFRGXG4yqG9IFnZKchSxy2mz48lthmJ43v0dZWRETqaT/ /Fs/XO3E91Yw5xz64zcrQzgO0J3LSfJ5mEauYF117aOSEm0035OA7KvDDjJhHL/tOfXM mxDcqVul9g+/btXtqq1hWcKirlHpPbqvzGvyLSdhhCnogw1lIjdBFekLVkmLlLXWoYt1 ot4J9yl4u8A/you9TIVUsuImoJWne0MQIwvsPris7QVIrzFYvh3kBlwTBdhNuPmcpmjj qaPg2RnlSmScWzwhnoqyrpy0st5AAXN91wK9lNd+gnkSeSiTCCZW5Rzk6QKoBagW4D1B HoUg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.119.230 with SMTP id kx6mr10074144wjb.13.1392511920684; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:52:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.133.169 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:52:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.133.169 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:52:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <E3F2DF53-903C-4FC4-AEFA-C38590E70247@cisco.com>
References: <E40F2B19-A4C8-4DED-91B8-B6590224A268@cisco.com> <CAKD1Yr2GBgxBvhHL1F=GbBbTwUvr8eXfqzwmjWTx2shwFngz6A@mail.gmail.com> <E3F2DF53-903C-4FC4-AEFA-C38590E70247@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:52:00 -0800
Message-ID: <CAD6AjGRFrKn2RTeprmDc_Xq3=2QT=uvEUiWp9HuoOkhzxRDoMA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Cb B <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0115fe2e60c5da04f27b727e"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/YM6741_TyY2Lb1Zl-TDP09HzFr8
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Proposed agenda
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 00:52:05 -0000

On Feb 15, 2014 4:35 PM, "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Let me ask for comment on the list.
>
> Folks, would you like to discuss this? I have a half hour to spare in the
time we have suggested.
>

I think this is important to discuss.

CB

> On Feb 14, 2014, at 7:05 PM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
>  wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com>
wrote:
>>>
>>> This is of course open to change; that's why it's called a "proposed
agenda". Please post to the list.
>>
>>
>> Would there be time to briefly discuss:
>>
>>
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yourtchenko-colitti-nd-reduce-multicast-00?
>>
>> This will be presented in 6man during a session on the efficiency of the
ND protocol, but I feel that it really belongs in v6ops, because it has no
protocol changes.
>>
>> Of course, since it was posted only shortly before 23:59 UTC, it fails
the "has been discussed on the list" test. :-)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> The ignorance of how to use new knowledge stockpiles exponentially.
>    - Marshall McLuhan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email