IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Tue, 03 November 2015 06:00 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390501B29AA for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 22:00:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WUwSvo45b4xc for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 22:00:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yk0-x230.google.com (mail-yk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53E2A1AD1A3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 22:00:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ykft191 with SMTP id t191so6356635ykf.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 22:00:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=GKSasYup33+JiU+a0yYa9mx1NnqphHfdL+Szv3no5p0=; b=ICpXj2r68WRC8jmBgdJ6CB/8rm5GVjaI1Bzlar9VnODI5EMgBziARwrw87H6Fe2SUr 0mD9WOgPCxZoTVEURGk027MDhQThP3CTq6YZflgYf4DesjG9mvnh3LcbQIzg7z7sKU7z KMVvq42z4khThWWiVO5LAWQov+vxfQ+hKgb/lUfNZauR2ZiYtLmKLYLo3+hwMlcQvAh+ kdv/AUbeKKoytQg+xdXu7EPKbmK5wBThiP0zBeHUD6usJJ+COUfWzMAxyuDkRGGM2JGi fu0F8bm+bhIGym1QM6pQsITVFyXDl//cX7aEicHkqOPcjoWlm5r4MjREOeZQhC+VXTo6 oikw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=GKSasYup33+JiU+a0yYa9mx1NnqphHfdL+Szv3no5p0=; b=YmoHwfPMVdRCfQXAIqLfg74do/3Z8ElgZNZ2kBGXf/JDvBWdlJhhQNghSJaqr8keqv asWSWrz9+eihQ3pBRIyg9LddcNia/eiKO2oc15Z/z20ijO7BReHS2O1t9XoH08GJqzJY KN9Or08ILNGIzfatusQdBPZVlbKhskXngpoMWVPvdQfOyKIsj8zoRXeKWVVuWll7YYBi INAQuwuhvUlBG/1o39GhGdHggcx7hWH/vuW50kBS/cy80rJQyPxEDOaJmFwi8Sdd1GiL iSENZNPbI081nUZVLcfFqktVAiINsrmwoYeVDzlV3bA1lTMr715fcU9+400G6/j/xShi Eotg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm21jXfJX3qKRt7Ng0HD/w9VoKyhsMmY8NjB4wl0U4BbVUQMQSVPuWgAjtikuHjicVaYB7e
X-Received: by 10.129.44.3 with SMTP id s3mr19325120yws.141.1446530421604; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 22:00:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.87.197 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 22:00:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C2319739@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <D25D5920.C914E%Lee.Howard@twcable.com> <5637FDD0.70300@jvknet.com> <D25E32F1.C9507%Lee.Howard@twcable.com> <CAKD1Yr1VvzkSmJo3hu6t_3CUguLN_UkNZjRUqvU_ygPBTyb+8g@mail.gmail.com> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C2319739@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 15:00:02 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3g-ZV+MkbtDrusbtYaZ_wmCxDG9XbT25Ldma4koGpV6A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Liubing (Leo)" <leo.liubing@huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114278def0244305239c9b59"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Yde47Hmmx-H4yk19VwMbdD8fCik>
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 06:00:24 -0000

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Liubing (Leo) <leo.liubing@huawei.com>
wrote:

> [Bing] I basically agree with this claim. But that is actually why we
> changed the document’s purpose from recommendations to considerations, that
> it only discusses pros and cons of those possible scenarios, and NOT make
> any formal recommendation.
>

>From the discussion of the deployment considerations draft in the v6ops
session yesterday, several WG members (I remember at least James Woodyatt,
Dave Thaler, Igor Gashinsky, and myself) believed that it is not enough to
list these deployment models with their pros and cons. Instead, these
deployment models should be listed separately as "deployment models that
are considered harmful".

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email