IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-experience-04.txt

Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com> Tue, 19 November 2013 20:04 UTC

Return-Path: <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9226E1AE19D for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 12:04:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.026
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.026 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.525, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4zWeJJ1CXw5P for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 12:04:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mtv-iport-1.cisco.com (mtv-iport-1.cisco.com [173.36.130.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DA5D1AE032 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 12:04:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=985; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1384891453; x=1386101053; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Yt2fgHlk0+E6wwuh1MDq3h7LuaNyycMYhuwwf0DqqNY=; b=AGjPLrrFRVVItsAw2OfumsjuH2cA6XzhZV1uhsn+SvZubB6PpxrHwOXa b/ZuuH2TWtuJZE/I+QSB74mpyEiTuIa+YnSffNk9rpUIb4oK5xHwaMJTZ xMW7vz5QeHK3C/4TZRwGRh+lCUVyRA7iS71C4Cygxeej/a3HpP+t0iPsq k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag4FAIXDi1KrRDoI/2dsb2JhbABZDoJ5wEuBIRZ0giUBAQEDATo/BQsLDgouVwYTh3sFv2MXjyQzB4MggRIDiUKOUJINgmlgGw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,731,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="94960768"
Received: from mtv-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.58.8]) by mtv-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Nov 2013 20:04:13 +0000
Received: from sjc-vpn1-158.cisco.com (sjc-vpn1-158.cisco.com [10.21.96.158]) by mtv-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rAJK43LL028291; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 20:04:12 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <EMEW3|6c6cf186237422be5b6c52ee0efc5bc1pADANL03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|DAFD19D5-0A16-4241-B327-701E27B0594B@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 12:04:03 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A6C7766C-1E51-4755-82CB-2F84202582B3@cisco.com>
References: <20131109132552.GQ81676@Space.Net> <6536E263028723489CCD5B6821D4B21303A157F2@UK30S005EXS06.EEAD.EEINT.CO.UK> <CAM+vMET6mqVQOm4GVnfkvNEGYuVSvTBVnrPOgFvj86Kmx8rnfw@mail.gmail.com> <20131111145452.GF81676@Space.Net> <52849009.80408@fud.no> <0154CE2C-C5EF-44FB-9B6D-5B2077267329@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|4580d6d3d7e7ef56092c0bcb14acc587pAD9Hc03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|0154CE2C-C5EF-44FB-9B6D-5B2077267329@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <20131114093318.GG81676@Space.Net> <152585E9-5D19-4F2E-8ED1-32925DE69137@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|c7a1b5ff805fac180f381803c6aa9abdpADAEd03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|152585E9-5D19-4F2E-8ED1-32925DE69137@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <20131114101829.GM81676@Space.Net> <DAFD19D5-0A16-4241-B327-701E27B0594B@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|6c6cf186237422be5b6c52ee0efc5bc1pADANL03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|DAFD19D5-0A16-4241-B327-701E27B0594B@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-experience-04.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 20:04:20 -0000

On Nov 14, 2013, at 2:23 AM, Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:

> On 14 Nov 2013, at 10:18, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:14:28AM +0000, Tim Chown wrote:
>>>>> That was about the NAT64 WKP appearing - or being added to - the 6724 policy table.  There is now a DHCPv6 option for that.
>>> 
>>> I believe that at least both Cisco and ISC are working on implementations.
>> 
>> That sounds like "the server side" - which is needed, but shouldn't take
>> a miracle to add.
>> 
>> More interesting to me would be "client side" :-)
> 
> Indeed.  And always the main problem/challenge with any new DHCPv6 option.

"Discovery of the IPv6 Prefix Used for IPv6 Address Synthesis" [RFC7050 (previously draft-ietf-behave-nat64-discovery-heuristic)] does not rely on the DHCP option.  Folks say it works.  But there is a general dislike for heuristics, for lots of good reasons. 

-d

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email