Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-incremental-ipv6 WGLC

Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com> Tue, 06 August 2013 02:34 UTC

Return-Path: <victor@jvknet.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD73B21F9D15 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 19:34:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.999, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PeCw1XlsuE1U for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 19:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-f178.google.com (mail-qc0-f178.google.com [209.85.216.178]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB5421F9A7D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 19:33:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id s1so2073604qcw.23 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Aug 2013 19:33:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id :thread-topic:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=3AZmmnaEDhsNEXVVoTLwx2w+3Epiv0Lc+ZTTmjH3ij8=; b=oemACWioddM64EmZJSfhV0cBPyq4GjxiXGvPE1cO99Ff0pEynF5vk0sJsDsnR3DwUn MQYwTYfqd/89hSnzvjABAilWGZlhmdZH+ppAx/o3AK94sXsdCApxnPFyWhjij+tPIGhT pHPEJx8yJDtJDisz0WBowhyTwITaA29Urj/YkU5+B71Jg2e3VWR+WO7kFc5uaHxMHSuI b91oxhAzeGo6588nGuHyT7PZ6Q826Ui85wQ1EEuUiezCnH7SS4seXQIyTWoZxaAE9Jdx V3iopLpBwKY69eCBBWTd8zICx+rKLfJpZtIRSkuGSx7e2cdM8KFUl2pRycW5jCV93Yhk NDCg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnrWzDcP06s/UmMfAIs+w4L7Qpb6ozypoXgvLYyV4O2pw+vi+d7K8uO18XLkp29YlxjGDkC
X-Received: by 10.224.6.7 with SMTP id 7mr570057qax.84.1375756437300; Mon, 05 Aug 2013 19:33:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.44] ([24.114.93.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u8sm3326203qey.5.2013.08.05.19.33.55 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 05 Aug 2013 19:33:56 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.10.0.110310
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 22:33:48 -0400
From: Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CE25D82D.52838%victor@jvknet.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-incremental-ipv6 WGLC
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr0sztQbUr=KZ5G9Q8Cauzo6cd+mDb-TWDVckz_tT-iBuw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3458586835_24053513"
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-incremental-ipv6 WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 02:34:03 -0000

Lorenzo,

For clarity, if the text remaining mentioned ULAs, but text removed
connecting it to NPT or NAT, would that meet your objections?  We then point
to drafts (draft-liu-v6ops-running-multiple-prefixes) and
(draft-liu-v6ops-running-multiple-prefixes) for use cases and further
considerations.  Of course, due warning on ULAs seems to be also warranted
(based on comments).



Regards,

Victor K

From:  Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date:  Tue, 6 Aug 2013 11:04:48 +0900
To:  Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc:  "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject:  Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-incremental-ipv6 WGLC

On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Brian E Carpenter
<brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems to me that any IETF consensus document should make it clear
> that ULAs are for internal use only, that GUAs should be used in parallel
> for external access, and that NPTv6 is (if mentioned) only an experimental
> specification.

Yes, yes, and yes.
 
> Also note that draft-liu-v6ops-ula-usage-analysis and
> draft-liu-v6ops-running-multiple-prefixes are around and cover
> this topic.

Which is why that debate does not belong in this draft and the authors would
be wise to remove this text so this draft can advance while we discuss those
documents.
_______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list
v6ops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops