IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] [dhcwg] IPv6-Only Preferred DHCPv4 option

Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> Thu, 05 December 2019 01:03 UTC

Return-Path: <furry13@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7835012003F; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 17:03:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4k7haSqJSUGo; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 17:03:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x830.google.com (mail-qt1-x830.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::830]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3C98120018; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 17:03:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x830.google.com with SMTP id b5so1785581qtt.11; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 17:03:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QRpbjfoQ8JKlAjjonavZV+eHNfEoZUCae0vGw3ZMAgg=; b=XgFr2E9DdGDntItFhZU5XNx/RwCREnuNlvm3QP9SI4oz8fk0Ejd3A2svxk3Wh6U/sb uR1b6N6n1uO7u4jKL1zOFNh7jlQ1Lv29OhYuJBbiSuEXVH99BVEh1E95aPefwybnFqk2 JXbcs9sXd2SqvzziZb72UK7i4GvxxbhJsVzJk92+tFILuicaDsKpdn+7TR9xS/UqOOKW V4OhgLxjNAZlMPbEiRWLW1shaMzbMdeaxN+9NQwHHhu5HbJ0KGRW1i98Xsz4ZtKBmVo0 MkZmLl+2h3hWOvPWgWB64BxkDNNBYVvvfOKyeKj23hFtkO/wkvYfUMPmeUbEJdAMCKab 7KDA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QRpbjfoQ8JKlAjjonavZV+eHNfEoZUCae0vGw3ZMAgg=; b=gFdR3TqqTu/k0IT47SIHUj3InpCVKq7L/J9870FBUiyFyx4FlvbmTQF1LY3qvFgPre 8lmX2OjVR09pLYYSyDAqeBjFuevzuTPgg6LAxxspK/guKJE3qdSaV6Ihc7ZizXXbWiPE /1DCetDUR9tu9rKuqkaBB6p3LB/vsZ84gZ/pgamIqRn9qnJDb1Jj1lXt40ZFImxggxeg bH5OFcAVPTJvsynP/9XxuagtTONnzFv2PEzoS2y2nM/wg/1d6oaLWsRpazCnXD+1bCIK j14lQOJDzlao9vudFSTjP575W1c+383pNouVnMcdX5s2iJ3iju4UwRN0ymgSGnb0sdK1 UPMQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVkhd9krF0L9/w06pRj4sDY4sd6qFxDKCm5hKRKWRwPZzuhfIRu qo6yBzHr/bYSTIlhM6jVvzb5+3zFsQtyQuXBxaY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzB2vC/u2+8D8LkxwYwh4weAY8qloMR7CTE08SclV/KXC9OKol1TraL5xKu7G7lPYK5NG48EvqKz2KHyiog+xk=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:1017:: with SMTP id z23mr5359738qti.94.1575507783675; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 17:03:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFU7BAR1JLUZps=CAqJfeQtUf-xQ88RYvgYrPCP+QP0Ter7YFg@mail.gmail.com> <E03BBE6C-3BED-4D49-8F79-0A1B313EFD9D@apple.com> <28594.1575483729@localhost> <CAFU7BAQp2-4EwntFj6Nx+be54-fi+gnQmRgT6yS22p=vYugpzA@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau1L_hdRMiGApa7VKuZ0_f5q1NJ-5sHMeg-dtTWa=Tq6bQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN-Dau1L_hdRMiGApa7VKuZ0_f5q1NJ-5sHMeg-dtTWa=Tq6bQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 12:02:52 +1100
Message-ID: <CAFU7BAS9iMBWkdQF_hwK7squvG9A5f38miS=sWLNns=ZxK4GCg@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, dhcwg@ietf.org, V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>, draft-link-dhc-v6only@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Z5qYmdbJP3yG0v0BC9hNVi-U3lU>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [dhcwg] IPv6-Only Preferred DHCPv4 option
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 01:03:05 -0000

On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 11:58 AM David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu> wrote:
> Also, is there any reason that 0.0.0.0 shouldn't be the address retunded by a server "if the IPv6-only Preferred option is present in the Parameter Request List received from the client and the corresponding DHCP pool is explicitly configured as belonging to an IPv6-mostly network segment" as discussed in Section 3.3?

We discussed that but some concerns were raised - allegedly it might
make some DHCP-snooping switches very unhappy.

-- 
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email