IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Mon, 23 February 2015 13:58 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B18A1A1A32 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 05:58:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZlX2pKuWbjM9 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 05:58:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22b.google.com (mail-ie0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 633741A0021 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 05:58:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iecrp18 with SMTP id rp18so23309369iec.9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 05:58:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=rK5Ew6N9eB9JIXhbkdrz2ivI8/gmaAhHGObWyfNs2kQ=; b=VGklfa0zTyPzqqgeuvvOPfCOcoG/4KSsse7uk+A8fGcISQLINVUmrwDsADMA3IlcDv xa79GPJMJHDTmaJUeavh5cKDF5FoACWer1MUpN8i9E4wPUM7vKpBg6DwrKamMTIe1mzm eYwNTWzYpvOjro2aIUxJO/+XopkLMLGcUVn/5/t/QtoFRRmpZi+siJatQzZ0kUkNgbPw 1796LYmV+h4js69U9qalP9ejI+aVcley7+yNRywYbkSDgB9I5PAIzHtBZTIBOyRbkdWI 1cxV2l0SgY+M6AY6LrIuCakzFtEWVUhqzzIPtOFfhMU+HCiWkv65Ut3cTuvIYvMOOcUa nZqw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=rK5Ew6N9eB9JIXhbkdrz2ivI8/gmaAhHGObWyfNs2kQ=; b=hCjZ71gTyG3ucpnV0Nq24+KQ+6LkTr3m6q4O7oLy2pU2JST03LCoyO9HfpU2dRHJMG b78uMoyswW4uakPAkiosJYA+JPie3XIx/RT+HjG0YeR8mI36IzoK1KsHvgj0twv//F8h GOVH1Mafin5mUhRCS/QbIaGSWKjOQS2CUtWp95pnopMhhhGwap91p6jN7SN36tniGjxh 8Esd+KG0exIb+44+xGUdugFtt2uGYO1Peg4pEmTTnmbrRS/7ZS53sle6f0zorAcfvIGJ TMU8UemMwjBfoMgT8SGrDwUMoUF3i5DUMi2bn2sYjMIrQQq8wbfdRFDN8WW99ktCfHyY ZYcQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn11Y3N7ddzXAeJ4Z9HjVfhFpVOUijfdwO0xR2atA4xdsDOk9SetDU+fl7ev0DshWyfhzXs
X-Received: by 10.107.36.9 with SMTP id k9mr14161157iok.2.1424699889551; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 05:58:09 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.33.104 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 05:57:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <D11092F8.1AD6E%dave.michaud@rci.rogers.com>
References: <8B808F0C-1AA8-4ABE-A06E-80652B9C1498@cisco.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1502201513320.4007@uplift.swm.pp.se> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933004912254@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAKD1Yr3A6fzgTauLz+Yxe-xOLeDLZ5bzKBo-XyWU4i9LBSAM9Q@mail.gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330049122B6@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAKD1Yr1c74gbnR51caf_WTKi7FFTbJP0KhwwXtabsvNhiE2Lgw@mail.gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330049124F0@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <D11092F8.1AD6E%dave.michaud@rci.rogers.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 22:57:48 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1ZG_rOZLCXtOjeNwAHbKzcnuRzUhitznp-5J0RP4CV9w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Michaud <Dave.Michaud@rci.rogers.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1140fe8ad46450050fc1caed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/ZAiemQnsn5lDBSwmxL3tYTjg3GE>
Cc: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:58:11 -0000

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Dave Michaud <Dave.Michaud@rci.rogers.com>
wrote:

>  In the first 2 causes (CC50 & CC51), the UE is to accept the PDP type
> selected by the network (IPv4 or IPv6) and not proceed further. Cause code
> 52 is the mean by which the network signals that it will allow two
> distincts PDP of different address type. In that case only is the UE
> suppose to go back and request a second PDP with the alternate type not
> offered by the network at the same time cause code 52 was returned.
>

Actually the behaviour depends on the release. Release 8 says the MS "MAY
request another PDP context for the other PDP type".

In any case, I think we agree that this is not something that we want to
recommend?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email