IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?

Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> Mon, 09 November 2015 06:14 UTC

Return-Path: <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69EE1B672C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2015 22:14:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wn-BfrHwcN5n for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2015 22:14:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yk0-x233.google.com (mail-yk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA16F1B672A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Nov 2015 22:14:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ykdv3 with SMTP id v3so159420145ykd.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 22:14:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=aFVxM/K+onv4UdJNEQV59Nrz8EOKzUvV89JR3UHf3CY=; b=ryRdPTkwjFh1edBEYGzBTk12sFkuJcM0pjXe6hzqK8bUx2JBq/5xMjCBZOxtw+u/Ps wfskhkCUCs6TTwq6s/nQRETZuXQNsPyg36N4o0eytbIFkWbi5yZ8tWTcs3sSyIxghKNb k9NH88+LESTZqFEPuP4RFpOmNhcdCy71MxWqhSnLA65C3uI5Y33HrsJVQhXp+plaqden JhiSISw/ybbDR5TtDxYc2TbHsQKC9htA58vspHJ3adhK6B8RV32bzARb2tXkBlFmiBiJ OyCv2KJUTcs5ELPYmZ+7SvW+DX7JaqwM7JuuRMH6cKzH/qCuygbt0QkIgGqr5DKi7EoB mADw==
X-Received: by 10.129.159.85 with SMTP id w82mr20915346ywg.323.1447049655285; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 22:14:15 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.45.198 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Nov 2015 22:13:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CA8B4AC3-AB12-44A5-97F2-105A97BB6974@cisco.com>
References: <D25D5920.C914E%Lee.Howard@twcable.com> <5637FDD0.70300@jvknet.com> <D25E32F1.C9507%Lee.Howard@twcable.com> <CAKD1Yr1VvzkSmJo3hu6t_3CUguLN_UkNZjRUqvU_ygPBTyb+8g@mail.gmail.com> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C2319739@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <CAKD1Yr3g-ZV+MkbtDrusbtYaZ_wmCxDG9XbT25Ldma4koGpV6A@mail.gmail.com> <563909FE.9080404@gmail.com> <CA8B4AC3-AB12-44A5-97F2-105A97BB6974@cisco.com>
From: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 17:13:45 +1100
Message-ID: <CAO42Z2wz9vdDvLTtYjcJ57fdfwrDYR=K75SJ3AkArfi=DqdtFg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/ZE-mzCyfqSEpBHoM6wHEmpb-HnY>
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 06:14:16 -0000

On 9 November 2015 at 09:40, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> On Nov 4, 2015, at 4:24 AM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think a careful explanation of the failure modes is more useful than a
>> bunch of SHOULD NOTs.
>
> Agreed
>

+1

We can't prescribe, but we can advise and describe.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email