IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-balanced-ipv6-security WGLC

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Wed, 13 November 2013 03:05 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE5F521E8085 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 19:05:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.583
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.583 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.016, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1U+FRgqNF6gJ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 19:05:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og126.obsmtp.com (exprod7og126.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.206]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E0021E8064 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 19:05:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob126.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUoLsaWzDN8das6brAFSFtCrk/7Vo1R+i@postini.com; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 19:05:14 PST
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87FC81B82D0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 19:05:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6331D19005D; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 19:05:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.132]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 19:05:07 -0800
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-balanced-ipv6-security WGLC
Thread-Index: AQHO3kcgifX5dH755Eqorh2n2HqLtpoih2QAgAAloACAAE48gIAACJoA
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 03:05:07 +0000
Message-ID: <D1C42C18-0957-49E0-ABBC-AC9983938F94@nominum.com>
References: <201311101900.rAAJ0AR6025350@irp-view13.cisco.com> <CAB0C4xOfz_JAjEEJZ-Zz7MBEyZhVzrAE+8Ghf1ggC3+9pyHmNg@mail.gmail.com> <989B8ED6-273E-45D4-BFD8-66A1793A1C9F@cisco.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1311130329180.26054@uplift.swm.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1311130329180.26054@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <7DAEB6F39CBBB043BEE8C67765C5E119@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-balanced-ipv6-security WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 03:05:20 -0000

On Nov 12, 2013, at 9:34 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
> Or am I mistaken and uPNP for IPv6 actually functional today? PCP I have never seen in home devices.

PCP is present in Apple's Time Capsule gateways.   It would be nice to see an implementation in OpenWRT, but you're right that none exists as of now.   There is a uPNP/NAT-PMP implementation for OpenWRT, but I don't know if it supports IPv6.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email