IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] draft-linkova-v6ops-nd-cache-init to working group draft

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 23 July 2019 08:29 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9611B120104; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 01:29:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jx0esgkA6Nn7; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 01:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x830.google.com (mail-qt1-x830.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::830]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12075120132; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 01:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x830.google.com with SMTP id h18so41085629qtm.9; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 01:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date :cc:to; bh=ub0Sn5q1yasNdWAzvjaBgECbexPmEy4kfvn4FcY7M8Q=; b=qvW3ihF4MN9L+pG4rLy5yjq1yw9YPyqwXWf9btiWV1KZU5P0Bh/0b9aMP848E01lYe sSJQpem+4CCE8STOwBCYy1cjFeShVQXnu4XdTuuhoBfuk+4o+FZQzhucFJLMAKAPzrBP p2eM98EF/p/OH6+eLPoyE9i5p5ehnzMnFjm4HZLVL1WuRlFPWDTqGoYkkCfhZFay95sv QeIIJrdihZ+HIWkNoFzyUKO7y1935W6sgWMV8KKEEDm9Zn2sLzDPHUR42tyscSaWWkWV hhOO9D4CZs9KuVF65evHogt7eXpT9bW/NPlsQZn+y/mUIM+yQeuBxv3bc3349K364rbD 5gcw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:message-id:date:cc:to; bh=ub0Sn5q1yasNdWAzvjaBgECbexPmEy4kfvn4FcY7M8Q=; b=ecUR7eQ12t3+T7JDzROCYpKv8FD+adlxFrcvG2aKnkkvdorqi7+ZX26zZOzunOryPv T1wpLatNTtVz9kh0KSy6x9SlnjsBumUyI8fmSKo2mYWvlHIWX358WiFlmIQmhnQbMiXL KaquCh640qLnxn6l3wwuXjCgRFCZ4U/ThwUXBUSdetIYIxBGbWO4AWRZ1PpyQgiKNGBH 2QkVfSjRjooOq9YHrKZ6dXvD2h9zgvA4YS+jf8ws4+YmEFsQaESrpxEt6eA7TCHuOZPo BFUxgYtvo2SdQ3iZlTDskHXvAXJ8MAMM2LJaQw4nf784DsoZpV7KA6DAiFuMxLI0+5Oj OdYw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUST9GHu3of0m9Q6BXd6uk1Hy7T7LZdbvgX1s+VCKrifsk8v72z VeNKJ1FKaTvl9WHvztCG7HmWxCFHJM8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyKFMrg+rNpzn4L2nogAOangEVpHb1xLf7D1rwYRlOzExnbIH0oUrZlBWmiwfSiwvED6XRPTg==
X-Received: by 2002:aed:3fb0:: with SMTP id s45mr53578071qth.136.1563870558014; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 01:29:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:1232:144:5908:c9bd:b360:a7ae? ([2001:67c:1232:144:5908:c9bd:b360:a7ae]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s11sm18332437qkm.51.2019.07.23.01.29.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Jul 2019 01:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3566.0.1\))
Message-Id: <351E8A83-734C-448D-B0C6-212C09D564F4@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 04:29:15 -0400
Cc: 6man Chairs <6man-chairs@ietf.org>
To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3566.0.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/ZgbItV2bZq5SPHoECLEuDLyoBac>
Subject: [v6ops] draft-linkova-v6ops-nd-cache-init to working group draft
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:29:21 -0000

In yesterday's meeting, the sense of the room and a discussion of charters at the mike suggested that draft-linkova-v6ops-nd-cache-init should become a working group draft. Doing so will require 6man to agree to let v6ops suggest specific changes to RFC 4861 under the rubric of "operational solutions", as discussed in the draft and https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/105/materials/slides-105-v6ops-neighbor-cache-entries-on-first-hop-routers-operational-considerations-00; the argument for not kicking those out to 6man is that the authors of RFC 4861 are no longer in a position to approve errata to it, which would be the other obvious approach (I'm not sure that's true of Erik Nordmark, but whatever). It would also need to be considered to update RFC 4861.

Do we agree to take draft-linkova-v6ops-nd-cache-init as a working group draft?

Ron and I look through this thread next week and take the necessary action, whatever the outcome might be.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email