Re: [v6ops] draft-byrne-v6ops-clatip-01

[Vízdal Aleš <[e-mail]>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: v6ops [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Fred
> Baker (fred)
> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 6:16 PM
> To: V6 Ops List
> Subject: [v6ops] draft-byrne-v6ops-clatip-01
>
> Following up from the recent meeting.
>
> We discussed clatip. The outcome was that we wanted to know
> what softwire wanted done with it, and I took the action to
> ask.
>
> The response from the softwire chairs was that they wanted to
> consider the draft there, and advance it from there. However,
> it appears to be bottlenecked. So, the softwire chairs have
> stepped back.
>
> I want the opinion of v6ops. Do we need this, or not? If we
> need this, we should adopt it, and then (I think) go to an
> immediate WGLC and potentially advance it. If it’s not
> needed, we should say it is not needed.
>
> Please reply in this thread.

192.0.0.0/29 seems to be a natural choice for IPv6 transition
solutions that require a non-routed numbered IPv4 interface.
(such as 464XLAT)

I support advancing of this work.

Ales

Zásady komunikace, které společnost T-Mobile Czech Republic a.s. užívá při sjednávání smluv, jsou uvedeny zde  http://www.t-mobile.cz/zasady. Není-li v zásadách uvedeno jinak, nepředstavuje tato zpráva konečný návrh na uzavření či změnu smlouvy ani přijetí takového návrhu. The communication principles which T-Mobile Czech Republic a.s. applies when negotiating contracts are defined here http://www.t-mobile.cz/principles. Unless otherwise stated in the principles, this message does not constitute the final offer to contract or an amendment of a contract or acceptance of such offer.