Re: [v6ops] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-v6ops-nd-cache-init-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> Wed, 09 September 2020 06:56 UTC

Return-Path: <furry13@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 373A23A1034; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 23:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nzbuXgnRgDDh; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 23:56:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72f.google.com (mail-qk1-x72f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 637A73A1032; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 23:56:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72f.google.com with SMTP id o5so1490110qke.12; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 23:56:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KmdLIUKw4q9pJLRIXaft4sWLQMcLkzyeq7dNB0DiFAs=; b=XJzJd4pkoAIPH3m47HkziDJs/hFT9mxIl2Snwk4mBieBUNyAjol/ox1If/EWHfHnEu kFsQPvdlDtzzXAR9FYDhlcXSQiAVwRL9gTKHjUJNR7Q3RCtovYx/ZcnhnUgKxm5o4utZ b61IiNL0Y6oa8z8L5IMbShQKihXZaE7ilFhEynthXt7X2OR1orhPtr+8QJ1k4rI+ACI6 pXjk6bQkv/MssG6oV2T4WrgHoggv3CUemNFUn45ugB5JynKdFAJxfO+H9OUYt/Sul8xg Be8GWzpHbClSCouI4DUsCOM1SAHx9+LkOV17+CBlAmZp/l7izsiGsxi8jpN0tMd1vN9X nUKA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KmdLIUKw4q9pJLRIXaft4sWLQMcLkzyeq7dNB0DiFAs=; b=j4FLLtfaxQVmuApzNUONNBMj+9Wxl3DjLZvMH2nbP/44wiUNTPcRt9ESrsT4MaOA4Y p9CJd4rIlecKDrs+YnSu3G89RkNoBtY2AoC3hExBMlfgrv3lAgv7m4DGosKL463IalFu +YjlqvAM7xjlxBenfveTHLbL6iiiNA7uAGymyi41FD56O6dFnuwB+4QbTob2LkpNwNLB Cx55XQ44F2QHDrrMRb/vyeYbv5gqyLhSdnbL2GuhlZsvjw6Os23uLyE/P7j8fzvDvd6+ FIqrxQjlwmKtgIvQ1U7enutF+SijVei7SFZStSC03H1SpEwp614ddpH2EtvigQB+ZUwg TTjg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531yzKwQSCGOSHbI0vyax0/ojQQEtMqtk7lSMnk9bDH43rwFo32W fd0kmfcfCtiqO7Ud8bCEZLqEe/9wlUoriBSYodv3bUKj
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzANNkTyp8bkEKMyD1qfu6O7eUcvMNlaL7MCMCUFcMmsq30bb3LtNFyLwvN8S+Ntjbel1D1ZZNBqX7qUZMpJmc=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:a414:: with SMTP id n20mr2123560qke.332.1599634614430; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 23:56:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159945918624.16282.1242894788269719566@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAFU7BASaitvqE00pZWOi4CDeCoasM_rS-XJEFR6tfAcgavUfJw@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJLTMMz-rWbp6oHOv+6nhMPRqj70PbKKAR5wPVO44yf2DQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJLTMMz-rWbp6oHOv+6nhMPRqj70PbKKAR5wPVO44yf2DQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 16:56:43 +1000
Message-ID: <CAFU7BASqkH5RGQ9qAZwQ8r_5EVh5K8nVOFtqOg_BCX6ZWfVdrA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Cc: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-v6ops-nd-cache-init@ietf.org, V6Ops Chairs <v6ops-chairs@ietf.org>, Jordi Palet Martínez <jordi.palet@theipv6company.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Zp6N6xp74oiulgCLXIJmRQipW-M>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-v6ops-nd-cache-init-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 06:56:57 -0000

Hi Barry,

On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 10:09 PM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
> I understand the issue of which working group works on which parts,
> but I do think that things can happen separately at earlier draft
> levels, but the documents could be merged at a later point, before the
> two working groups finish with them.  That v6ops is done with this
> part already... makes it easy to transfer this finished piece to 6man
> for inclusion in the other.

6man is actually done as well, the draft is under AD review currently.

> I'll discuss this with Warren and Erik,
> and we'll collectively figure out what we think is best.  If we think
> we should do a merge, we'll make a proposal to the two WGs.

Sounds good. Merging two drafts should be easy.

> (And to be clear, I'm looking to make it easier for the reader to have the
> relevant information in one place, without the reader's having to be
> aware of the particular WG structure, charters, and scope.)

yeah, that makes sense indeed.
> Barry



-- 
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry