Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call- "harmfully broad"?

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Sat, 14 February 2015 01:31 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9561A1A7E for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:31:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xR7Q6TIDa495 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:31:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x235.google.com (mail-ig0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CF391A1A78 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:31:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hn18so14226169igb.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:31:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=q4Jii/3Z7UNQEkBgOVuNwY7zwq5K4jpuEc1o59lKaMA=; b=V38DmJ2WLfuMohswYU/a0QMGGfvSTTJfvy3x0gdZF7A6T/FXAar8KouJbh6C0QN/gP +72Ql03gs/bh+7tpHw/RRSXLg6zCUoMkRkPezSneskX3stLoDB3vHw8kaJBXOZQ7hlu3 PloDZwcNyaZVMc/Go3TfiJGl8CFkLfBgZEJIYlbP5tzLby6mjIK3vqvnCTmTLRdT0Tjz Wm8OPgRuVUPfE1sb0VZWo4fLRFkW9TsHpLKNNZ0+3pbgsTrGspGKH9pF9pYkQrp5Lkcb +uC2K8jNgJZxnZFtCd2Lf6mmZqCNoW6erlrtzzj9AUTkpvGljWJSXDuOh2MmjdLt6Ib9 fd0Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=q4Jii/3Z7UNQEkBgOVuNwY7zwq5K4jpuEc1o59lKaMA=; b=H07OkiZWr6yEGMU03ebfAcZ1AdrSpy/T6NyjWSqGk+5UKSf0eTjeMYkf29yIozBM/5 W0PSBtNy7U4XBOxScNihJAuy/86OeHFq4ytiHlQP9pG99qi4LnppQKbSO4gQPd0VZz+G fkL10/pfA4xYw4dLK1+15hc8eqXZ52rSMvlURJQ1OQuiN5unzZk1D2rMZelPSCLhn8+C D6wZRoBJesumxJO6SYeRCeZtEDFZF/sdXSIGXdzrzl8PL+l1T7gqYbxvynsHqiz6Z4zN 953hgBNWxru4nwepx4qwxrKAoojs3LGcEDZFAI4t0d2DSx4+6p4VThpYUOrmlhex1KYM bguQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlXCN8KPMD93o01FzhKpErhd/vIEOS1SuuRZbUa2L8wV6iYhAVJtFIXFZGDzG1b7Xn562ym
X-Received: by 10.107.25.135 with SMTP id 129mr16288562ioz.44.1423877512683; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:31:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.33.104 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:31:32 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <6536E263028723489CCD5B6821D4B21303DEA706@UK30S005EXS06.EEAD.EEINT.CO.UK>
References: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330049091C2@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAKD1Yr2yDnwPDHgsq3Wi3UOzKY7KrqSpBMbBttJ5qAAu6ijOAw@mail.gmail.com> <54DDF02C.8020903@gmail.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E61130F231B4@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <6536E263028723489CCD5B6821D4B21303DEA706@UK30S005EXS06.EEAD.EEINT.CO.UK>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:31:32 -0800
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr0j23E-UMdL2Ujv5nrpbbUa9rgPE_6AhbHLn0JeOZ9Edg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Heatley, Nick" <nick.heatley@ee.co.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113fd5e4590afa050f025118
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/_8DYAFTDTX-V2i_bHeJvM77bKuw>
Cc: "IPv6 Ops WG \(v6ops@ietf.org\)" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call- "harmfully broad"?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 01:31:55 -0000

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Heatley, Nick <nick.heatley@ee.co.uk>
wrote:

> Lorenzo, I feel you are like the specialist surgeon berating the GPs for
> not knowing every RFC in its pure form.
>

No, I am berating the authors of this draft for writing a document that
makes GPs (=device manufacturers, other network operators) believe that
they have to prepare loads of unnecessary medical machinery (=the many
recommendations that this draft makes) before they can open a small GP
surgery (=deploy IPv6), without bothering to tell them why they need all
that machinery and what they're supposed to do with it.