[v6ops] IPv6 Roaming Analysis Document
Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com> Fri, 02 August 2013 09:06 UTC
Return-Path: <victor@jvknet.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 969DD21F85BB for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 02:06:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.291
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.291 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.089, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 99tKPqmy-6X3 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 02:06:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3345011E82B9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 02:01:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id ro12so458152pbb.27 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 02:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id:thread-topic :mime-version:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=Dfxlw6Zsj+cAeD2MJOC/C983ZzAouB0EfZT+InbMnQI=; b=hlQUQmO+eZpABeG+JKIhhDi0+i6HbBxnOvhCmsHD7ZXkGJvNiXnh+jc+agZrG0vfE1 3ooCqXIe8YNphg4RS8Umr8rswxU0Y4MOxpyYJUkpLHvoZPXTqnlHYak0xcMJwdMiSfPt BjtL2HT9B7DbTejny7z0tMrVV3lQ+ejZut+qfE+wSOMj3m0YBpd2SHfRTpjL8Q8PQbU8 aYO44xFrC5mcjbwJtgVmYy8m0CoOpiq7OdxTMGhGlooA2fjGrtosdPqRczU4aXTetBab 4IW1Okk8nXH4WWZ9+T+XS2bkKrjfyV/KV/Q87Ixt3tXvbjVQ2wOSzvW/GgV75/3YzV+x sswQ==
X-Received: by 10.68.172.34 with SMTP id az2mr2426589pbc.201.1375434059767; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 02:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.129.16.166] (dhcp-10a6.meeting.ietf.org. [130.129.16.166]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id e7sm7514305pbc.11.2013.08.02.02.00.57 for <v6ops@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 02 Aug 2013 02:00:58 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.10.0.110310
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 11:00:54 +0200
From: Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Message-ID: <CE2141E6.52481%victor@jvknet.com>
Thread-Topic: IPv6 Roaming Analysis Document
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3458286058_15723434"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmmc3KpHyQ+Xs+haIluhdg4dZqRZVo1xejjp46/cjrLjZghUuZd81nMAyFnKvkxt8sc9t7j
Subject: [v6ops] IPv6 Roaming Analysis Document
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 09:06:50 -0000
Group, As per comment on mic, this information is good, but to be effective as a communication tool, we need to get information back to GSMA. The document seems blur the lines between technology and business. I would say that keeping the information clean and only addressing technical issues is best. We can then allow the GSMA to become aware (I.e. Fred's suggestion to liaise with GSMA) of issues and technical issues, allowing them to address business components. I agree with comments on mic that not everyone reads the 3GPP and/or GSMA documents so a IETF document may help reach more people. Regards, Victor K
- [v6ops] IPv6 Roaming Analysis Document Victor Kuarsingh