Re: [v6ops] draft-templin-v6ops-pdhost a working group draft?

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Mon, 20 November 2017 18:19 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1113612E05C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:19:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PjblbGMtFsp2 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:19:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BDD8126B7F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:19:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 9BD08B1; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 19:19:49 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1511201989; bh=ljalkG7OoqfS7tCXgdsopETP8Nmxmmf19MiVYFas8/0=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Y/ADLcYRKJ/JCkoeYqA+mzlTv3jLOulioKcoATc43KYKVHo5duou4gUSQYVibZcTa Nty3MMyH2LrjgS9B3fGtiu0NcByWdjVO0rxg1EbwqT3DcwA6SWr1vaOrwa8Qy6tggw mEbiKgGNuJHKTPdaLMH4Yns++4vJML+Zi5VB/j8U=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83748B0; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 19:19:49 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 19:19:49 +0100
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
cc: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <20171120121835.GO45648@Space.Net>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711201559150.32099@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <7FC2CA6E-8BF7-47BC-9164-1877FAF83FD0@gmail.com> <962041fbaee844b5a4cdd82012440dbe@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAKD1Yr2=qVdGNzvwCXaofhH=fBaQS0M05Lg6MKF3MEze7UUfXg@mail.gmail.com> <ABF8D7E4-BF1A-422F-9652-69394E000913@employees.org> <CAKD1Yr0ZF-0QXTwtUaA4HQ0meS0=REhUD-TJWXvAxL1VtA4OOA@mail.gmail.com> <D300BD4F-29C2-4546-B601-8E109773F9B8@employees.org> <CAKD1Yr0BH_qi25a65fowkiO2HZOqQ=uT7dgXr1epK=XpsgjUrQ@mail.gmail.com> <31EC6585-3C75-4DDF-9059-3411C20770DF@employees.org> <20171120121835.GO45648@Space.Net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/_aFi9S89T5cPZ-C42XeI7PzpNlU>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-templin-v6ops-pdhost a working group draft?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 18:19:54 -0000

On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, Gert Doering wrote:

> So it's reasonable to spend a bit of thinking on "what would a host do
> with a /64 if it knew it's all reserved for itself"

We did some of this thinking in the PIO-X draft in 6man. It's not 
complete, but there is some thinking about it...

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se