IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-64share

Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com> Sun, 20 January 2013 01:47 UTC

Return-Path: <cb.list6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B69B21F879A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:47:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.773
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.773 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.175, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lcJbQF-8Jnj0 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:47:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-f48.google.com (mail-la0-f48.google.com [209.85.215.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C268621F8797 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:47:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-la0-f48.google.com with SMTP id ej20so4956396lab.7 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:47:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=vDhHsOqXn7xayTvXGKjab/pZ7IFW+VITVX5vm/8QOOw=; b=hK5ND4sWNfZNowUDXLqqTzRGd8pmEZMLi5ie7nPNO6+edN+CmdvIPLWQXkP65pJa39 Nyqchi42ok5eq7o4/JF2HWm4z6GJzrzSzkMeCDHMSSiWqr9SDsgn3jedJbHw8G+Iat1z Qu0RS8pR1Ah6hRy5bb8TdSmvhqiBA6NDoDB27UjRaYU7/zzmaVhQsWmSxSTkiNrMOK2F tZbT2a7uYtI1JGkWN4bOmp55DjoOr9md+3nYC0EhKzZGqvYTRBX5zdmXiOeUfQ96zLxN HuNmDI6HVQui+msnZUBlLc8dr4lcQvcNK7zuClDSrrivhR+EdiT7UKfhwD+spvNv61w6 VpvQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.124.15 with SMTP id me15mr13195252lab.5.1358645031321; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:23:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.44.36 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:23:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.44.36 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:23:50 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:23:50 -0800
Message-ID: <CAD6AjGSEOva1RzDXJqmstFk=13JnPUSWM9rQ3PmXCXPQQwcBDQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d0437458177bfd504d3ae329e"
Subject: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-64share
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 01:47:45 -0000

Hi,

I posted this update as a WG draft

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-64share-00

Please take the time to review this update and share your feedback.  I
hoping that a clearly defined scope, clear need for this work,  as well
running code will make it easy to advance. I am now aware of 3
implementations that approximately use this method (ios6, an LTE mifi
router, and Dan Drown's Android submission)

CB

Sent from ipv6-only Android

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email