IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Implementation Status of PREF64

Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-10@u-1.phicoh.com> Tue, 28 September 2021 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <pch-b9D3CB0F5@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33BB83A328D for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 08:57:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EqYXHeHnFmoP for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 08:57:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (stereo6.hq.phicoh.net [IPv6:2001:981:201c:1:2a0:c9ff:fe9f:17a9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B80C03A3276 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 08:57:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (localhost [::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by stereo.hq.phicoh.net with esmtp (TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305) (Smail #158) id m1mVFTr-0000HTC; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 17:57:19 +0200
Message-Id: <m1mVFTr-0000HTC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Cc: Fernando Gont <fernando.gont=40edgeuno.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
From: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-10@u-1.phicoh.com>
Sender: pch-b9D3CB0F5@u-1.phicoh.com
References: <CAN-Dau2in52xSUkqKEXu=2AAiR4O_jLhna7hY-hshYDORfGtcQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMGpriWFp4JPtqDK5tEj1RkS-SzEfvscfUUnxgK+o6qP2pusRA@mail.gmail.com> <6E95834D-12B3-447B-8326-8EDE9DC6FFB1@delong.com> <CAO42Z2zA-4cK489nxKsWUN8vvU0eAiz-jS0e-_eWPg+OmP8wLw@mail.gmail.com> <DDA36020-90CC-471B-83AD-3D98950F1164@delong.com> <CAO42Z2wdoSdJDOB2Zo0=ZK0ecOARRsdg2nbHZGSDOhryPbLfDw@mail.gmail.com> <F2BD0A42-E9AD-45DD-999A-638E73BE1177@delong.com> <CAKD1Yr2K3Gd3JD=NJFOoH6GYgs-8ACxRQB9-sKJ7cbF4_hxsow@mail.gmail.com> <0B533C71-5DB0-410D-A5A3-7E8FD559F214@delong.com> <CAKD1Yr3NoYfNT7+OVJoCCdgdif6AHHw29tNCPttS=-NuRZKv3w@mail.gmail.com> <385d7417-a260-ad95-874b-2e576b8c4a6a@edgeuno.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 28 Sep 2021 12:40:13 -0300 ." <385d7417-a260-ad95-874b-2e576b8c4a6a@edgeuno.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 17:57:18 +0200
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/_mi0t5BbQy9ezhM5MNRFHe8oPqg>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Implementation Status of PREF64
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 15:57:31 -0000

> As per "multiple addresses": the general case of multi-address,
> multi-router scenario is currently simply broken.

Do you mean that RFC 8028 is broken or that nobody implements it?

And I assume with 'multi-router scenario' you mean routers that don't 
coordinate. If you have multiple routers that are aware of each other
then a multi-prefix, multi-router scenario works just fine. At least, it
works for me :-)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email