Re: [v6ops] [saag] ITU-T SG17 IPv6 security work items liaison

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

Thanks Russ, will make those changes.
S.

On 14/06/11 00:57, Russ Housley wrote:
> Stephen:
> 
> Comments below.
> 
> Russ
> 
> 
>> From:  IETF Security Area
>> To: Study Group 17, Questions 2 and 3
>> Title: Work on Security of IPv6
>>
>> FOR ACTION
>>
>> The IETF thanks Study Group 17 for its liaison LS-206 "Liaison on IPv6
>> security issues".  As the world transitions to IPv6, new opportunities
>> and challenges and challenges arise.  SG17's new focus on deployment and
> 
> s/and challenges and challenges/and challenges/
> s/new//
> 
>> implementation considerations reflects this reality.   We would like to
>> bring to your attention the following work which we believe may prove a
>> useful basis for both X.ipv6-secguide and X.mgv6:
>>
>>    * RFC 4294 – "IPv6 Node Requirements" (N.B., this work is currently
>>      under revision)
> 
> Why not just reference the bis document?
> 
>>    * draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis (work in progress) – "IPv6 Node
>>      Requirements RFC 4294-bis"
>>    * RFC 4864 – "Local Network Protection for IPv6"
>>    * RFC 6092 – "Recommended Simple Security Capabilities in Customer
>>      Premise Equipment (CPE) for Providing Residential IPv6 Internet
>>      Service"
>>    * RFC 6105 – "IPv6 Router Advertisement Guard"
>>    * RFC 6106 – "IPv6 Router Advertisement Options for DNS
>>      Configuration", §7 in particular.
>>
>> As you are aware, every RFC contains a Security Considerations section.
>> In developing either a implementation or deployment guide, contributors
>> are strongly encouraged to review the RFCs and Internet-Drafts that
>> support any underlying function.
>>
>> In addition, we bring to your attention the following IETF Working
>> Groups that are working on security-related work of IPv6:
>>
>> Working Group  Purpose                     Mailing list address
>> Name
>>
>> 6man           IPv6 Maintenance            [e-mail]
>> savi           Source Address Validation   [e-mail]
>>               Improvements
>> dhc            Dynamic Host Configuration  [e-mail]
>> v6ops          IPv6 Operations             [e-mail]
>> opsec          Operational Security        [e-mail]
>>               Capabilities for an IP
>>               Network
>>
>> In addition to the above working groups, the Security Area of the IETF
>> maintains a mailing list for general discussion, [e-mail].  We
>> encourage and invite open and informal discussion in these or other
>> relevant IETF fora on this very important topic. As with all IETF
>> working groups, any and all interested parties can choose to directly
>> contribute via the mailing lists above.
>>
>> As in other areas, the Security Area of the IETF invites SG17 to bring
>> any new-found concerns about IETF protocols to our attention so that as
>> and when we revise our documents we can make appropriate amendments to
>> IETF protocols. In particular, as this planned work matures, we would
>> welcome hearing about it in more detail, perhaps via an invited
>> presentation at a saag meeting or via review of draft documents as may
>> be appropriate.
> 
>