IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05: (with DISCUSS)

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 22 October 2020 13:46 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A48033A0C10 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 06:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S1UJ-yhpU8tp for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 06:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2d.google.com (mail-io1-xd2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A3AF3A00D9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 06:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2d.google.com with SMTP id b15so1652783iod.13 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 06:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RQgAkJS7AADMssSbCogj0LDkKkXsMq1mI5ZMS7RSgtk=; b=CLPq/wopMm/ME++1AeP4qR5tuHnGackXngL6ZI5Bter6zX1ZUWPDvgdtXa7xmuzCd8 qzE+Ka43oWovmk/q1hT8/mmcu9NGdO/LqlGXcJgsMfGogJWZxVQjke5sMvuEQl8ZIPYD XEaHWsNvxs1UQkFP+F1o/aUBRzTS5PFKJbPweBCW85YVNd94vA/vWaxOpCLjXye443s4 /hySVIG8v0VsO9YX6VW0Dxda/snhNpK49uUp7ZYBY0FVjA5ZltHwCSny5IjSq99ePqIF bIhfbcCcqXyjnM4SkaQruoRLcq9/LjrI4OxiHAQeuRVqOXZNlVsLxVjh6y3ImVLWTmlO D91g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RQgAkJS7AADMssSbCogj0LDkKkXsMq1mI5ZMS7RSgtk=; b=lWJJUrcb9mluSTploBwhdF0WJLz/LeL97ye/VTkM8+hcozFFqXoWxUZltQhvt0UvQG rT/bAyA/GH+rJLBVXoFoHj6XaPmcpekjyT26iUYiXKYFDeAt88IjlsZ7nMY/08/feSkD p/q9y72RQTpCYpNwZqjT8bA67kOOCnVo/9ZievTXL72bFpKzdE0MllmSYS6P3xBLPk+L CjbdfhZa5ZSzfYSTHERpqwbOiO5G59XKSJZHcsuBr1b0VV/oiPQiOxmrDwcN8i+g9uug dQapAU5mwLahL74tuvymwl4rt7avTBTrsGA7Egy1cjIV/cBXZ8PBctoyEq8JKWcJLfJR akkA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531EHLr8hA1aWGtCVD3ctPY6gTE+X4TyQstizhv2yjXM5IsD1Y1N P79sNh3/F5Q2eqdZyr/2Sj33YaObOqhLuUl4TRZB0g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJydl9V6MbSMVEbeodmXgFNFzRQoQVOAeE+D7wkvzIvShYrW/dlo/2PKYSkdBPVLzYo3NF8p1rLdqddndw/x0ss=
X-Received: by 2002:a5e:dc0b:: with SMTP id b11mr1257509iok.179.1603374374340; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 06:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160337261986.9706.15256831018374618832@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <160337261986.9706.15256831018374618832@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 22:46:03 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3CiVMHbab+7CK4Jiz3oN5k67CHdJtfEOGPE6QWVWJrZg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, V6Ops Chairs <v6ops-chairs@ietf.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum@ietf.org, v6ops-ads@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000006bffa05b242b0df"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/_x201awbFT4TSBRXQjo9d2-SWv0>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:46:21 -0000

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 10:17 PM Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05: Discuss
> [...]
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Let's resolve the document status issue -- it was last-called as Proposed
> Standard, it's listed as Informational, but it seems like it should be a
> BCP.
>
> I support Rob's DISCUSS and I believe the RFC 8174 boilerplate should be
> used.
>

I don't think this should be classified as BCP without sending it to the WG
for another look. WG consensus was reached on the assumption that the
intended status was informational. I suspect many WG participants would
have looked at the text with different eyes, and held it to a
different/higher standard, if the intended status had been BCP. I know for
sure that I would have.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email