Re: [v6ops] draft-binet-v6ops-cellular-host-reqs-rfc3316update

Jouni,

Trying to make sense of 3GPP's thought process here -  

* rel 10 includes DHCPv6 for PD, rel 11 keeps DHCPv6 (for NA!) optional.

* SLAAC is included (rel 8 onwards!), but complimentary RDNS stays excluded.

I guess 'simplification' is very subjective. ;-)

Cheers,
Rajiv

Sent from my Phone

On Sep 25, 2012, at 4:04 AM, "jouni korhonen" <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> On Sep 25, 2012, at 7:39 AM, MAWATARI Masataka wrote:
> 
>> Dear authors,
>> 
>> I read throuth your draft.
>> 
>> Comment about REQ#6 and REQ#7 on -02 version regarding conveying
>> DNS server.
>> 
>> I heard that both of DHCPv6 client and RA options is not common on
>> 3GPP mobile network at least for now.
> 
> Specific to 3GPP, its "NAS" layer can deliver the mobile the DNS server
> address among several other configuration things. Since NAS is in 3GPP's
> hands it somehow gets preferred.. Currently as for Release-11 DHCPv6 is
> still optional and RDNS is not there at all.
> 
>> This document describes that if RA options is not supported, the
>> cellular host should embed DHCPv6 client.  Will RA options have
>> more appreciated than DHCPv6 client on mobile?  However, both
>> requirements have same SHOULD.
>> 
>> Such a document should provide the clear preference and reasons
>> about that, in my opinion.
> 
> The preference ordering is in the text already in a way in req#7 it
> seems but could be more clear/strict.
> 
> - Jouni
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Kind Regards,
>> Masataka MAWATARI
>> 
>> 
>> * On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:12:56 +0200
>> * <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Re-,
>>> 
>>> We submitted a new version of the I-D integrating the comments received in the list. In particular, the following changes are made in -02:
>>> 
>>> * DNS64 requirement is now a SHOULD as suggested by Ted
>>> * Add a new requirement to RFC5555 as suggested by H. Soliman
>>> * Remove the requirement about ND Proxy but instead a new paragraph has been added to describe the problem raised to share /64
>>> * Add a new requirement for RFC4191 as suggested by L. Colliti, Behcet and Jouni
>>> * Correct a typo about DHCP client (3315).
>>> * Welcome new co-authors
>>> 
>>> A detailed diff is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-binet-v6ops-cellular-host-reqs-rfc3316update-02
>>> 
>>> The new version is available at: http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-binet-v6ops-cellular-host-reqs-rfc3316update-02.txt
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Med
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops