IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Implementation Status of PREF64

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Thu, 30 September 2021 15:51 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 869763A0D55 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 08:51:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oHSaOYJmCH6g for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 08:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 958B23A0D40 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 08:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from crumpet.local (admin.ibn.ie [46.182.8.8]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.17.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 18UFpYmX031295 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 30 Sep 2021 16:51:35 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host admin.ibn.ie [46.182.8.8] claimed to be crumpet.local
To: "Dale W. Carder" <dwcarder@es.net>
Cc: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <CAO42Z2zA-4cK489nxKsWUN8vvU0eAiz-jS0e-_eWPg+OmP8wLw@mail.gmail.com> <DDA36020-90CC-471B-83AD-3D98950F1164@delong.com> <CAO42Z2wdoSdJDOB2Zo0=ZK0ecOARRsdg2nbHZGSDOhryPbLfDw@mail.gmail.com> <F2BD0A42-E9AD-45DD-999A-638E73BE1177@delong.com> <CAKD1Yr2K3Gd3JD=NJFOoH6GYgs-8ACxRQB9-sKJ7cbF4_hxsow@mail.gmail.com> <0B533C71-5DB0-410D-A5A3-7E8FD559F214@delong.com> <CAKD1Yr3NoYfNT7+OVJoCCdgdif6AHHw29tNCPttS=-NuRZKv3w@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR02MB692426B0EEDDC2C4D78D8EC0C3A89@DM6PR02MB6924.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <CAKD1Yr25dtinLBeJpAuJ17NfLg7-ewM9QPvnXNuEJ8wiBQV9ig@mail.gmail.com> <82919780-5f62-fea0-7bc9-9d3dfc10548e@foobar.org> <YVXY5SMvWPNJvCZc@dwc-desktop.local>
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Message-ID: <0a3ad846-8ba9-ccfb-d98b-9ce16c632edc@foobar.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 16:51:33 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.16; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/7.0.49
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <YVXY5SMvWPNJvCZc@dwc-desktop.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/a6uH8mMZzCMO2aESdxfhJRlCjCo>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Implementation Status of PREF64
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 15:51:47 -0000

Dale W. Carder wrote on 30/09/2021 16:33:
> Is there enough meat for a -bis document?  I don't currently believe so.

the benefits and issues provided in sections 3 and 4 of this document 
are weak enough that they don't really provide enough justification for 
the document to be worth maintaining as a BCP.  From this point of view, 
a -bis would a good idea.

It would be troubling for the IETF to continue to refer to the document 
as a BCP without a substantial revision.

Nick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email