Re: [v6ops] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment-07: (with COMMENT)
Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Fri, 12 July 2019 01:36 UTC
Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C866120020; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 18:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DKU9a6hVU64w; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 18:36:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from taper.sei.cmu.edu (taper.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A40712004D; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 18:36:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korb.sei.cmu.edu (korb.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.30]) by taper.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x6C1aJe1006753; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 21:36:19 -0400
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 taper.sei.cmu.edu x6C1aJe1006753
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1562895379; bh=/qxHoOa/F1l0AloUL2zJd0a3waLzk0rXOv7MzqPZNMc=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=GNsSL6m2x6EiQoAOQ866gl0aWeHCc55WLu57AVcqdzBUVtQaMO2WCScSDGGvtp7KM 3bvvMGU3iRHHMqEi1ndNrGCXalCkMQWCTh2WLhnc1RwMj6tRqB2Lyz7GVxJBgn57Gh X3vWv7/ObhLwGWIAGIyQyAr7lS4Nl32zc5BytkjM=
Received: from CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cassina.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.249]) by korb.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x6C1aGss019322; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 21:36:16 -0400
Received: from MARCHAND.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.251]) by CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.249]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 21:36:16 -0400
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: Jordi Palet Martínez <jordi.palet@theipv6company.com>, "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>, Jordi Palet Martínez <jordi.palet=40theipv6company.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment@ietf.org>, "v6ops-chairs@ietf.org" <v6ops-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment-07: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHVN4HXDqwoxMuSdEau0nlmDxvmhqbFOx6AgAAG+oCAAAYZgIAA6+5g
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 01:36:15 +0000
Message-ID: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01B33CE0F3@marchand>
References: <156280587243.15387.3448756354265835528.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <E34C8182-E7C9-48A3-91F0-23BABA469292@theipv6company.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302EAC9D83@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <2A20F73E-F59A-4945-B563-8E6C9EDEDA03@theipv6company.com>
In-Reply-To: <2A20F73E-F59A-4945-B563-8E6C9EDEDA03@theipv6company.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.22.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/aN5OzYK4ZssY68h1o5Y7-Cu_SoM>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 01:36:26 -0000
Hi! > -----Original Message----- > From: Jordi Palet Martínez [mailto:jordi.palet@theipv6company.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 3:27 AM > To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com; Jordi Palet Martínez > <jordi.palet=40theipv6company.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; Roman Danyliw > <rdd@cert.org>; The IESG <iesg@ietf.org> > Cc: v6ops@ietf.org; draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment@ietf.org; v6ops- > chairs@ietf.org > Subject: Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64- > deployment-07: (with COMMENT) > > Hi Med, > > Thanks a lot! that's a very good "middle point" reference. It is only about US, > I will try to see if there is a similar one that shows also other regions. > > Regards, > Jordi > @jordipalet > > > El 11/7/19 9:05, "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" > <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> escribió: > > Hi Jordi, all, > > One comment below. > > Cheers, > Med > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Jordi Palet > > Martínez > > Envoyé : jeudi 11 juillet 2019 08:41 > > À : Roman Danyliw; The IESG > > Cc : v6ops@ietf.org; draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment@ietf.org; v6ops- > > chairs@ietf.org > > Objet : Re: [v6ops] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops- > > nat64-deployment-07: (with COMMENT) > > > > Hi Roman, > > > > Thanks a lot for your inputs. > > > > See below, in-line. > > > > Regards, > > Jordi > > @jordipalet > > > > > > El 11/7/19 2:44, "Roman Danyliw via Datatracker" <noreply@ietf.org> > > escribió: > > > > Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment-07: No Objection > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut > > this > > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss- > > criteria.html > > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment/ > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > COMMENT: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > (1) Section 5. Is there an informative reference that can be made > > about the > > successful deployment on cellular networks? > > > > Do you mean citing specific operators? I can name several in almost > every > > continent, but I'm not convinced this is correct in an IETF document ... > > I'm flexible. The text asserts this is used widely. I was wondering if any informative reference could point to that. > [Med] No need to be exhaustive here, I suggest to add one single pointer: > https://www.worldipv6launch.org/major-mobile-us-networks-pass-50-ipv6- > threshold/. Having an informative reference is helpful for this kind of > statements (because otherwise, this may be considered as speculative). > > > > (2) Section 7. Consider adding an explicit statement such as the > > following > > after the intro sentence that “no new security considerations are > > added”: > > > > As noted in the relevant sections above, the NAT64 and DNS64 > > technologies can > > impact the efficacy or functionality of key security (i.e., DNSSEC and > > VPNs) > > and privacy preserving (i.e., DNS-over-TLS and DNS-over-HTTP) > > technologies. > > > > -> I will need to reword it. This is right in the reference to DNSSEC. > > However VPNs and DNS privacy, the point is on the other way around > (those > > technologies can avoid the DNS64 performing correctly, and thus, break > > NAT64). Right. I botched what-breaks-what so please do reword it. > > (3) Editorial Nits > > > > ** Section 1. Editorial. s/today unrealistic/unrealistic today/ > > > > ** Section 5. Typo. s/learn he/learn the/ > > > > ** Section 5. Editorial. “Hundreds of millions of users” mentioned > > twice. > > > > OLD: > > NAT64/464XLAT has demonstrated to be a valid choice in several > > scenarios > > (IPv6-IPv4 and IPv4-IPv6-IPv4), with hundreds of millions of users, > > being the > > predominant mechanism in the majority of the cellular networks > (which > > account > > for hundreds of millions of users). > > > > NEW: > > NAT64/464XLAT has demonstrated to be a valid choice in several > > scenarios > > (IPv6-IPv4 and IPv4-IPv6-IPv4) in cellular networks which account for > > hundreds > > of millions of users. > > > > Noted and corrected all those nits in my internal version. I will wait a > > couple of days before publishing it, in case there are any further inputs. Thanks for fixing these. Thanks, Roman > > > > > > > ********************************************** > IPv4 is over > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > http://www.theipv6company.com > The IPv6 Company > > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or > confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the > individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, > copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if > partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be > considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this > information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, > will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original > sender to inform about this communication and delete it. > >
- [v6ops] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-iet… Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
- Re: [v6ops] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft… Jordi Palet Martínez
- Re: [v6ops] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [v6ops] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft… Jordi Palet Martínez
- Re: [v6ops] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft… Roman Danyliw
- Re: [v6ops] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft… Roman Danyliw