[v6ops] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-v4v6-xlat-prefix-01
Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Sun, 28 May 2017 06:49 UTC
Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1BAD1293D6; Sat, 27 May 2017 23:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-v6ops-v4v6-xlat-prefix.all@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.51.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <149595419894.24426.7074020393438812680@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 23:49:58 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/av1RsVh9bX8ylKv2Jgh-_FxaYpw>
Subject: [v6ops] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-v4v6-xlat-prefix-01
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 06:49:59 -0000
Reviewer: Roni Even Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-v4v6-xlat-prefix-?? Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date: 2017-05-27 IETF LC End Date: 2017-06-05 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: The document is ready with issues for publication as standard track RFC Major issues: Minor issues: I was wondering why this document does not update RFC6052. My reasoning is that RFC7915 section 6 says "The translator MUST support the stateless address mapping algorithm defined in [RFC6052], which is the default behavior." This document suggests that the mapping in this document can be used. Nits/editorial comments:
- Re: [v6ops] Genart last call review of draft-ietf… Tore Anderson
- [v6ops] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-v6o… Roni Even
- Re: [v6ops] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of … Alissa Cooper