[v6ops] Re: Éric Vyncke's Yes on draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc3849-update-03: (with COMMENT)
Nick Buraglio <buraglio@forwardingplane.net> Mon, 24 June 2024 18:10 UTC
Return-Path: <buraglio@forwardingplane.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0676C16940A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:10:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=forwardingplane.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gapygYWU0zFI for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:10:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x231.google.com (mail-oi1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::231]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24BCEC14F738 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:10:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x231.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3d229826727so2764152b6e.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:10:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=forwardingplane.net; s=google; t=1719252608; x=1719857408; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ejO5b0cnTq0HZJYmjv/QbYbIj65oEauosOc4fOAD36A=; b=rEe/IHEAxDAM1r4GyvRSDZK0fWGpsPuTy7ngQnH2KF/tppqnKWsjwDR6+sL1nMpr9l WDwXe8l1TNdALEuhu6hu5hIq6xKMH5wdGhDF6LhBKgRshfofLPxfPT9SdscgVbRl//YV yweHmIdtNBsnmroq6JXgQ2OgmOO5+bEsFFQoA=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1719252608; x=1719857408; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ejO5b0cnTq0HZJYmjv/QbYbIj65oEauosOc4fOAD36A=; b=VZz7F3tZ7KAztTUoe3hsD2DpUyOA0tZHxv+tEjq6YmUc4TZ5j/eLoY74c5J/+SrtXx hJCvQpxYha0Y3kc4aSoSV/Okihz/dcvjuQz/MMser1pQJH+wIWaQMSzHtbDhRR2DTNO6 GjcNP1uRI4zrgpJ3QqGU9YNt728OirvMEtNn155+4OTixlpXn2W4SwcXuB01JfSq0vCK +g+HtMrdw/2tkmDOWaXLC7pBC01ewb2m/cATVf8V5oo6y1yPZHu8OAd3bQHvobaX5rY5 hpI4hWnEP5Wl++GvSEa24lbRis/YpNgL1hZMZyOojI2HqsnW/wp/faxj0NKddmbmppcJ SdmA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVk5Lk1DQ9+eoEBuqs50fdLofivubL1KSfTrXIdCTZmggVlS8Q+ZaNzdAJgvMA0ZO68562hrw4PAFoT5hpyUg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw1F3Sc+ep6so+76bwH5AHCnW4qWep2mEpXEfSezQ2BU3P3HYkk S8om/BtdiNLFv2zjXHKBzgOyaEmTtfQJkDqCg8O5nwXN7kDRTS4F+im53p+XWdxMpSYCvycRYfK CqxsXPlbwveaivin9rgRTeuEAplevYozGWKtYO67EDatmg3Q/hA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGvrOaKgGXA3/Zm2dP1VyiqIfVuCDEj8PSqBig6qyuTlSYTJyoxzBe1pO+NU6F99ALDBPzwOiqmwHVsX4KWuNM=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:14c6:b0:3d2:2703:2573 with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3d543acb10cmr7147504b6e.8.1719252608406; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:10:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <171880808677.26889.1490232056871487464@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <171880808677.26889.1490232056871487464@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Nick Buraglio <buraglio@forwardingplane.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 13:09:57 -0500
Message-ID: <CACMsEX-+yrgp4pRufan5a=Fa2xk+z9B4CNXNtron24irBh8XZQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID-Hash: RX7W2OIZTBLQI6QYVNC6YIE2NKLTIVME
X-Message-ID-Hash: RX7W2OIZTBLQI6QYVNC6YIE2NKLTIVME
X-MailFrom: buraglio@forwardingplane.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-v6ops.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc3849-update@ietf.org, v6ops-chairs@ietf.org, v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [v6ops] Re: Éric Vyncke's Yes on draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc3849-update-03: (with COMMENT)
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/axfLqPrDyW_8vAWLVQFimjzcjQw>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:v6ops-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:v6ops-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:v6ops-leave@ietf.org>
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 9:41 AM Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > > Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc3849-update-03: Yes > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc3849-update/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > A short, nice, and useful document. Thanks for taking the time for authoring it. > > Thanks to Ed Horley for the detailed shepherd write-up *but* there is no > justification for the intended status (perhaps just a reference to RFC 3849 ?). > > Nevertheless, I think that the document would benefit from: > - using RFC 5952 canonical IPv6 address representation (or at least stick to > all lowercase or all uppercase) - remove the BCP 14 template as it is *not* > used (this will even make the I-D shorter ;-) ) - the IANA section should > clearly mention "IANA IPv6 Special-Purpose Address Registry" in the text (and > not only as a reference) We'll work on adding the IANA IPv6 Special-Purpose Address Registry > > More important, I think that the security considerations should add something > like "this /20 should be considered as bogon (add reference), i.e., packets > whose src/dst belongs to this /20 should be dropped over the public Internet' > (note the non-normative language). Thanks for the meaningful input. Would you like this in addition to the text for appropriate use in section 3? > > >
- [v6ops] Éric Vyncke's Yes on draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc… Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
- [v6ops] Re: Éric Vyncke's Yes on draft-ietf-v6ops… Murray S. Kucherawy
- [v6ops] Re: Éric Vyncke's Yes on draft-ietf-v6ops… Nick Buraglio
- [v6ops] Re: Éric Vyncke's Yes on draft-ietf-v6ops… Nick Buraglio
- [v6ops] Re: Éric Vyncke's Yes on draft-ietf-v6ops… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)