IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] NAT64/DNS64 and DNSSEC

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Wed, 29 July 2015 20:58 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@Space.Net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE861B2B4C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zPSHcgiB-ZYO for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.space.net [195.30.115.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46C461B2B1E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:57:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CEA560613 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 22:57:56 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius3.space.net (moebius3.Space.Net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::250]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2915C600DF for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 22:57:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (qmail 25285 invoked by uid 1007); 29 Jul 2015 22:57:56 +0200
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 22:57:56 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <20150729205756.GR84167@Space.Net>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1507230910190.11810@uplift.swm.pp.se> <4797B33E-9851-427E-8710-84122AFD0FFA@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="p8BcnzLwh3ipgLRM"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4797B33E-9851-427E-8710-84122AFD0FFA@cisco.com>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/b0CrZ1BPG-QOqAy1wgIjGoklUUg>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] NAT64/DNS64 and DNSSEC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 20:58:01 -0000

Hi,

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 03:00:01AM +0000, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
> Between us girls, I don't think many of us really like NAT64...

I think it's the best thing that happened in quite a long time :-)

So, yes, I like NAT64, when the alternative is "client network with
dual-stack IPv6 + NAT444'ed IPv4".

Dual-stack is an annoyance, dual-stack with NAT44(4) stinks.

gert

-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email