Re: [v6ops] Is there any working on DoS attacks solutions for IPv6?

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Mon, 11 November 2013 17:18 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D92611E81B8 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:18:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.416
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.416 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.183, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pYectFVMP6-U for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:17:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB2911E81B5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:17:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1177; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1384190279; x=1385399879; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=Mj+0Le+hw390I5ohRYNrH7alLMMQu7io0+tRrcxh9Q8=; b=K60ksRg/wxsN5s4zwTpAB8tDMSiHnw0MXpGqPaC2dZyEtH83LkAQCE8o YGpyaVKhI7WhFWFGLqz5Pg4f50LzkjXE2VTgt29nkHkfcolbaB0T14DgH 5lyuBnUOA/Ubkohtsi4aqvPyVnRN9R81N/ZcWUZ4Q05WOelL1VMoFxWxa o=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 195
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhkFAKYQgVKtJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABZgwc4U6w7klyBPRZ0giUBAQEDAXkFCwIBCEYyExICBA4FDg2HVAMJBg2+Nox1gnIHgyCBEAOQMIEwhEqBZYEviyOFOIMmgio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.93,679,1378857600"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="280336610"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Nov 2013 17:17:58 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com [173.36.12.77]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rABHHv4k004173 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:17:58 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.122]) by xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com ([173.36.12.77]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:17:57 -0600
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: sajjad akbar <sajjad_akr@yahoo.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Is there any working on DoS attacks solutions for IPv6?
Thread-Index: AQHO3wH2+ycra0l4qEeaMrsHAyUMgg==
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:17:57 +0000
Message-ID: <249D4B28-BB5D-4DC1-A688-0074E94B8948@cisco.com>
References: <1384166133.10720.YahooMailNeo@web121504.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <1384166133.10720.YahooMailNeo@web121504.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.121]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_408096E3-D908-4390-8F26-6D60F43B32C9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Is there any working on DoS attacks solutions for IPv6?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:18:09 -0000

On Nov 11, 2013, at 2:35 AM, sajjad akbar <sajjad_akr@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Is there any discussion regarding IPv6 dos attacks and it's prevention efforts?

As Warren points out, there is quite a bit that is applicable in Opsec. You can find drafts with links at http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/search/?name=opsec&rfcs=on&activedrafts=on&sort=. The charter, with instructions for joining the discussion, may be found at http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/opsec/charter/.