Re: [v6ops] Questions about draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison-04
Yannis Nikolopoulos <yanodd@otenet.gr> Mon, 18 May 2020 19:00 UTC
Return-Path: <yanodd@otenet.gr>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144D73A1006 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 May 2020 12:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y4GdblfhIPxN for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 May 2020 12:00:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from calypso.otenet.gr (calypso.otenet.gr [83.235.67.36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F35B83A0E18 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2020 12:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.3] (unknown [94.69.70.153]) by calypso.otenet.gr (ESMTP) with ESMTPA id D775813803D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2020 22:00:05 +0300 (EEST)
To: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <11ec16a31cae4c1ba9df4277bebb96af@cht.com.tw>
From: Yannis Nikolopoulos <yanodd@otenet.gr>
Message-ID: <636e52b0-01fc-babf-b2a9-033f986d6f1a@otenet.gr>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 22:00:05 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <11ec16a31cae4c1ba9df4277bebb96af@cht.com.tw>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------69B6342F938DD13C086DECBA"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/bBnk_odbEWNSLYv5ZiUH87SY9Hk>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Questions about draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison-04
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 19:00:19 -0000
Hello, On 5/6/20 6:16 AM, 朱彥如 wrote: > > Hi: > > There are some comments about current ipv4ass implementation in > Section 4.4.2. (Support in Cellular and Broadband Networks) in this > document as the following: > > In broadband networks, there are some deployments of 464XLAT, MAP-E > and MAP-T. lw4o6 and DS-Lite have more deployments, with DS-Lite > being the most common, but lw4o6 taking over in the last years. > lw4o6 taking over? Can anyone support this statement? I'm aware of a few DSlite deployments but not a single lw4o6 production deployment regards, Yannis
- [v6ops] Questions about draft-lmhp-v6ops-transiti… 朱彥如
- Re: [v6ops] Questions about draft-lmhp-v6ops-tran… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Questions about draft-lmhp-v6ops-tran… 朱彥如
- Re: [v6ops] Questions about draft-lmhp-v6ops-tran… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [v6ops] Questions about draft-lmhp-v6ops-tran… Yannis Nikolopoulos