Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-ipversion6-loopback-prefix-00.txt

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Tue, 17 February 2015 16:43 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA6511A700A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 08:43:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tJMM-Bg3mnIp for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 08:43:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAE111A1EF3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 08:43:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3544; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1424191436; x=1425401036; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=jYVvkiQv+Xt8ftykNKALhs4kj2O0UENzgltMEF4wjbw=; b=iVqQ2r4dodGG5tmie97zs4VRILJFNitEGruSNYJk4b/7CdiwPFAfya3y hSk1gWhdthmPEHltdxjleZ7AVYVpndfFdX3CPCO0qJPZEM79SioE8LJxk RrgfTCKQ1q6TXy2OmspGH2zvYcpu3DD5+4Mznu8Zyyt6JlSoAlOm4x9X5 E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0APBwBxb+NU/5xdJa1bgkNDUloEgn+9JDyBboVxAhx5QwEBAQEBAXyEDQEBBCNUAhACAQgEOwMCAgIwFBECBA4FiC8NuT+XcAEBAQEBAQEBAgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBF4sPhG4HgmgugRQFjziDV4VggVCRPSKCMoE8bwEBgUJ/AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,595,1418083200"; d="scan'208,217";a="124319589"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Feb 2015 16:43:56 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x02.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x02.cisco.com [173.36.12.76]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t1HGhugf025371 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 17 Feb 2015 16:43:56 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.138]) by xhc-aln-x02.cisco.com ([173.36.12.76]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:43:55 -0600
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-ipversion6-loopback-prefix-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHQSjzmjePUrZUB9Eib5lFaIWQ/lJzz6mWEgACCWYCAAQUyAA==
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 16:43:55 +0000
Message-ID: <CD85542A-7EC3-4471-9F49-A38B6A17F67C@cisco.com>
References: <CAAedzxq9cy2NjR98RQ=Z2uWGM=DuCKcBmnOV2r1iDhd1G5F0Kw@mail.gmail.com> <602226231.6806482.1424078950598.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <DED2296C-010C-4B75-94DC-028C0FA19E6F@virtualized.org> <20150216232213.3123C29A61F1@rock.dv.isc.org> <CAKD1Yr3oYFL4=nwQPZjq9aoMazttXp5doROLas-n7KfkRGPTzQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr3oYFL4=nwQPZjq9aoMazttXp5doROLas-n7KfkRGPTzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.117.115.61]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CD85542A7EC344719F49A38B6A17F67Cciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/bcs5-APU-YUMLedcEiZOaOWHxW0>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-ipversion6-loopback-prefix-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 16:43:58 -0000

On Feb 16, 2015, at 8:09 PM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com<mailto:lorenzo@google.com>> wrote:

The value of the loopback prefix is not that it's routed to loopback. It's that *everybody knows* it's always routed to loopback.


+1.

By the way, another use case for a loopback block is in http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7439#section-3.4.2

Thanks,

— Carlos.