Re: [v6ops] Protocol Action: 'Deprecating Anycast Prefix for 6to4 Relay Routers' to Best Current Practice (draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-11.txt)
David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu> Mon, 09 March 2015 21:01 UTC
Return-Path: <farmer@umn.edu>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA771ACD68 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 14:01:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f2w4FIBZgS7a for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 14:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs-w.tc.umn.edu (vs-w.tc.umn.edu [134.84.119.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 422961ACD52 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 14:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-f170.google.com (mail-ig0-f170.google.com [209.85.213.170]) by vs-w.tc.umn.edu (UMN smtpd) with ESMTP for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 16:01:25 -0500 (CDT)
X-Umn-Remote-Mta: [N] mail-ig0-f170.google.com [209.85.213.170] #+LO+TS+TR
X-Umn-Classification: local
Received: by igal13 with SMTP id l13so24799605iga.5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umn.edu; s=google; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:organization:user-agent:mime-version :to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yoL05LaAX9HjygYF4aClMH54Aa3s3yduqd6V8H3jmOQ=; b=UJmhxFZCRGSKcw4LkkPysUbprp1ccaOOzgsyHugpdYcl4PQzqFwaK2ksaIm99Wbnsh YfpQr3ZGTFNqMrsvKY5YvgHsaQM/Nfb2kRSGuimkXw+7A3cJa546wkIQtgQMu3CH6zG6 8QdPfoOrFWEQdw4iTKtklY/lwZj9pphiiwJCg=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:reply-to:organization :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yoL05LaAX9HjygYF4aClMH54Aa3s3yduqd6V8H3jmOQ=; b=ky+mc6GRkFO+vd36yKG69I/f0P/WPHPqJRTshBQbRirdCq5wvWfKaHIiLMl9+Bz6D9 RfYxN7peBkQEgFZag9M9BLSg20tQSRtIh87saLYVARY91gO91DmQBbYZPLWOQbfpBJs8 NZhOB4T9ZIuxP/BZmgZF+dPMakHERYIsqP7nSip8QV0nB4+KpBEOdxJEHXfL0ZBady9k xWXmSQ+wg0ETlJhXQcZR9OmKZUKt22MGwJYUIEcMsfNL1R2nmaqBHSjFLLMWBqBQUDoL aZI36EIOjJDhejULsR3Q8bcFyzfo+Q9OUvjr8PmnhKPnWydBQfCnfFjUKuL5YD1uRzOA HOJQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlL734kUrR+dD9QU7rlKQOoh7ayZSFqDAMsstQTNKQSZVG2n3sv18S+wIPzfMFKFB9QnWqpIKhRCdPYpyAOulOd30BGo5UKAv3fXJjglUNwn5jcOvYkdYBcP1BdzRGYl1Gbyu4P
X-Received: by 10.42.66.208 with SMTP id q16mr30035348ici.11.1425934884775; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.42.66.208 with SMTP id q16mr30035328ici.11.1425934884600; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from x-128-101-235-196.uofm-secure.wireless.umn.edu ([2607:ea00:104:2000:687f:9eae:792d:586e]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id e3sm364158igg.16.2015.03.09.14.01.19 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <54FE0A1B.2010009@umn.edu>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 16:01:15 -0500
From: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
Organization: University of Minnesota
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <20150309163330.30198.34988.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150309163330.30198.34988.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/biaajXitPenvG82xuKzVIiJ-Jxg>
Cc: v6ops mailing list <v6ops@ietf.org>, v6ops chair <v6ops-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Protocol Action: 'Deprecating Anycast Prefix for 6to4 Relay Routers' to Best Current Practice (draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-11.txt)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 21:01:27 -0000
On 3/9/15 11:33 , The IESG wrote: > The IESG has approved the following document: > - 'Deprecating Anycast Prefix for 6to4 Relay Routers' > (draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-11.txt) as Best Current Practice Good News! ... > In response to the IANA review: > > OLD: > > Instead, IANA is requested to mark the 192.88.99.0/24 > prefix originally defined by [RFC3068] as "Deprecated (6to4 Relay > Anycast)", pointing to the present document. > > NEW: > > Instead, IANA is requested to mark the 192.88.99.0/24 > prefix originally defined by [RFC3068] as "Deprecated (6to4 Relay > Anycast)", pointing to the present document. The Boolean values > for the address block 192.88.99.0/24 will all be removed. What is the rationale for removing the Boolean values? Wouldn't the current values apply until the prefix is repurposed or removed by future protocol action? I'm not sure I really care, but I don't understand what is served by removing the current values. I'm not sure what purpose the Boolean values really serve, but the current values seem the most appropriate until the prefix is permanently removed or repurposed. Thanks. -- ================================================ David Farmer Email: farmer@umn.edu Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952 ================================================
- [v6ops] Protocol Action: 'Deprecating Anycast Pre… The IESG
- Re: [v6ops] Protocol Action: 'Deprecating Anycast… David Farmer
- Re: [v6ops] Protocol Action: 'Deprecating Anycast… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Protocol Action: 'Deprecating Anycast… David Farmer
- Re: [v6ops] Protocol Action: 'Deprecating Anycast… Nick Hilliard
- Re: [v6ops] Protocol Action: 'Deprecating Anycast… David Farmer