IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-hilliard-v6ops-host-addr-update-00.txt

Ross Chandler <ross@eircom.net> Mon, 17 July 2017 21:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ross@eircom.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22ACD131CC5 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:21:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.772
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.772 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.347, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AQZwSc6Y3O4z for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta04.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (mta04.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.118.171]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E084131CBB for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:21:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 31828 messnum 20195015 invoked from network[213.94.190.14/avas02.vendorsvc.cra.dublin.eircom.net]); 17 Jul 2017 21:21:13 -0000
Received: from avas02.vendorsvc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (HELO avas02) (213.94.190.14) by mta04.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (qp 31828) with SMTP; 17 Jul 2017 21:21:13 -0000
Received: from [192.168.1.4] ([86.40.119.162]) by Cloudmark Gateway with SMTP id XDS5dFM71dkx5XDS5dLRJz; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 22:21:13 +0100
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=EOR26xRC c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=ET4DzX2cQ4ZB4To4uwT5YA==:117 a=ET4DzX2cQ4ZB4To4uwT5YA==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=30CTBInHot3YrxSAE4AA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=6kGIvZw6iX1k4Y-7sg4_:22 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.0 \(3439\))
From: Ross Chandler <ross@eircom.net>
In-Reply-To: <27c2da26-630a-4cfc-3085-b33bdba53a8b@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 22:21:13 +0100
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4171F21D-A063-4173-8B9D-634DC360D891@eircom.net>
References: <596CF817.8040900@foobar.org> <CAPt1N1mm6gMEQN0KQ60e=vROOEbooxOBpZEGBm9SGP4WwBDtnw@mail.gmail.com> <CACWOCC8M0HJdvWm02FbZeKH8S4-X9-dnE7xjMkQTXEFY=CrDnQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1m10bWVTkvoD+x3gKcvNDjBODSJM1rVF=DpE+NxzFAFjQ@mail.gmail.com> <F13E7782-9888-4CA1-85D4-F349C6EB3E57@eircom.net> <27c2da26-630a-4cfc-3085-b33bdba53a8b@gmail.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3439)
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfBukHR97+PEzO03iwcOrzgtfG9hg3x7n6vQ84ZcoxZxnQUPzxmV6JZWzce5C1ioNzZ3YYDzHhRoH9QafJpOSythu3dC34nTZ2R2EhqsNGZi6DXm7Jhjc tpCcoVYcgKDJtxO2Pr1jeH7MOURXk4NcZAjwGjFUIBqm5KP1QI21lhuzVM1hwy0eTTAUNfrivHa9JbUYa24gMoSOI2qM1KBhVaI=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/bz9zjgKljKNgKD6Yj6ALNIeH_nw>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-hilliard-v6ops-host-addr-update-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 21:21:17 -0000


> On 17 Jul 2017, at 21:58, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> There is something wrong with that draft: it only allows for 64.  Why?
> DHCPv6-PD can delegate other plengths, like 65.

I agree that is a deficiency.

>> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-pioxfolks-6man-pio-exclusive-bit-02.txt
>> 
>> Introduces an eXclusive flag to optimize RA for nodes that are
>> exclusive receivers of all traffic to the prefix.
> 
> This is another way of calling RA “Prefix Delegation".

Fair enough.

> There are other drafts doing Prefix Delegation with RA, have you
> considered them?

No, what are they? The above one caught my eye because of the employer of one of the authors.

>>> uthors of RFC3315, and I agree with this
>>> view.
>> Given the above two drafts DHCPv6-PD to hosts has an uphill struggle
>> to ever achieve widespread deployment.
> 
> I don’t think so.

You’re more optimistic than me then. 

> I think DHCPv6-PD should be trialled at IETF WiFi and then we’ll see.


Yes, it should.

Ross

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email