Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-yc-v6ops-solicited-ra-unicast

Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> Thu, 09 July 2015 06:21 UTC

Return-Path: <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D1BB1A9176 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 23:21:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OkMml1jrtwd3 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 23:21:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22f.google.com (mail-ig0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3B1E1A916E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 23:21:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igcqs7 with SMTP id qs7so73027794igc.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 23:21:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=JXNVJBfuydQtY8Gn+0a4Ppb5TefGMubACQXQbzThW3s=; b=la/m+o9lyCXBpeizHCfdv+x6cwmvyhLyuQCgo4YeBVczdxpsoCQLmTR72VHzS93jIO wW4plVokLoTYojm7h1vX3FziLQWz93iqg0EKgcYUdKpRbQ78FEjyIujyE13EezPoI3bF OjzcKTdH4m27BMN3Y0agIAUroKrc76w88SWVpRkz+podHRO9xBVqPaNwJwk+TWyXDaFx 8gE/axZ1vDSY1jU8ZbOBO4hK57T/9uTFDtsRCJtePxPPmyoqUhz5EV5j9JBLFWcA+Ycs FQU/EC/kk8sYso2a4awki9V7yeVpz/jgLtb0xTB/szC0AUoiCaAOp2S8LYvgMxcpT0tH o9Nw==
X-Received: by 10.50.18.43 with SMTP id t11mr95627214igd.25.1436422880358; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 23:21:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.36.205.5 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 23:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <EF21B630-5D0A-415A-A93F-9058900CC80C@cisco.com>
References: <201507071147.t67Bl13m009348@irp-lnx1.cisco.com> <CAO42Z2x7mNFbB_w_+W+80pY+LeCAKXaOBXMmQvkcaMSWhwW60g@mail.gmail.com> <EF21B630-5D0A-415A-A93F-9058900CC80C@cisco.com>
From: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 16:20:51 +1000
Message-ID: <CAO42Z2zeV_9GFsQEpyA8mCz1mtLR-Qc_QAcv_s3Po9nNQjNgwQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/c-TzfN6hPvWAZBzrUutXEa1FXJQ>
Cc: "draft-yc-v6ops-solicited-ra-unicast@tools.ietf.org" <draft-yc-v6ops-solicited-ra-unicast@tools.ietf.org>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-yc-v6ops-solicited-ra-unicast
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 06:21:22 -0000

On 9 July 2015 at 15:38, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com>; wrote:
>
>> On Jul 8, 2015, at 10:08 PM, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>; wrote:
>>
>> One thought I have though is that I wonder if just changing solicited
>> RAs from multlicast to unicasts would result in an increase in the
>> number of multicast RSes?
>
> Sounds like you have a tool that you could use to simulate that and find out?

Ok, I'll set something up.