IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Fri, 13 November 2015 13:47 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E6A1A87E4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 05:47:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ziA88LglyE7w for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 05:47:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E84C41A87E9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 05:47:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Envelope-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from crumpet.local (089-101-195154.ntlworld.ie [89.101.195.154] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id tADDl3qv043710 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 13 Nov 2015 13:47:03 GMT (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host 089-101-195154.ntlworld.ie [89.101.195.154] (may be forged) claimed to be crumpet.local
To: Michael H Lambert <lambert@psc.edu>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1511050424410.1055@moonbase.nullrouteit.net> <20151106.063106.74659839.sthaug@nethelp.no> <CAO42Z2x3O8A1XKqN3PTcvM=xpF8W_WNSL1rVhHQ4ZY5HbVG=OQ@mail.gmail.com> <20151106.081425.74651560.sthaug@nethelp.no> <6ED54502-C5D1-4D09-877C-FE283E3EF142@delong.com> <20151112184613.GZ89490@Space.Net> <03C04D1B-86D1-4A5A-A8D3-7508CEC80DE9@delong.com> <20151112194327.GA89490@Space.Net> <95BC3D07-EF27-45A9-A1E0-12F9B43061C7@delong.com> <20151112214819.4EDE63C98D83@rock.dv.isc.org> <CAKD1Yr1jA_PKcjc7tiC9VhQ9yFM=SRzF6fc+fUzk89Jtb4Bvww@mail.gmail.com> <CAKr6gn1uhQhHHQcMj1VyS5+euqEiAQMwtoaF_vsnZQWzqF=MJQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511131342540.24520@uplift.swm.pp.se> <0723DCF1-DE0F-4BBB-9673-17686EB823CD@psc.edu>
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Message-ID: <5645E9D7.4070009@foobar.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 13:47:03 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0723DCF1-DE0F-4BBB-9673-17686EB823CD@psc.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/c4tirLK_pddvWId38NPMRBwAz4E>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 13:47:09 -0000

On 13/11/2015 13:27, Michael H Lambert wrote:
>> On 13 Nov 2015, at 07:49, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
>> Also, why should a core router in Europe have to care about an office connection being affected by something on the other side of the globe?
> 
> Indeed.  Unless one is intentionally trying to design a chaotic system.

The type of chaos which which involves most ASNs having a full view of the
Internet is less bad than the type where only a handful of them do.

Nick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email