IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-templin-v6ops-pdhost a working group draft?

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Mon, 20 November 2017 18:15 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 549281296D2 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:15:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s8FXXWqJzOYc for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:15:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.space.net [195.30.115.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47AF31296CD for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:15:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4846340B9B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 19:15:46 +0100 (CET)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 375FC406DF; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 19:15:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 24EAB8B55; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 19:15:46 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 19:15:46 +0100
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
Cc: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20171120181546.GS45648@Space.Net>
References: <7FC2CA6E-8BF7-47BC-9164-1877FAF83FD0@gmail.com> <962041fbaee844b5a4cdd82012440dbe@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAKD1Yr2=qVdGNzvwCXaofhH=fBaQS0M05Lg6MKF3MEze7UUfXg@mail.gmail.com> <ABF8D7E4-BF1A-422F-9652-69394E000913@employees.org> <CAKD1Yr0ZF-0QXTwtUaA4HQ0meS0=REhUD-TJWXvAxL1VtA4OOA@mail.gmail.com> <D300BD4F-29C2-4546-B601-8E109773F9B8@employees.org> <CAKD1Yr0BH_qi25a65fowkiO2HZOqQ=uT7dgXr1epK=XpsgjUrQ@mail.gmail.com> <31EC6585-3C75-4DDF-9059-3411C20770DF@employees.org> <20171120121835.GO45648@Space.Net> <a4495fe059594084970a6abb9544e090@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="T1iPLtA/uXXp7jA0"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <a4495fe059594084970a6abb9544e090@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/cIUaoD9GXvP2G3OL_wHAgqvwQBs>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-templin-v6ops-pdhost a working group draft?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 18:15:51 -0000

Hi,

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 05:49:51PM +0000, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> We have DHCPv6 PD working with OpenVPN on Android today - have
> been using it for the better part of two years. We are currently using
> the kea DHCPv6 server and it works great, but I am sure the many
> other publicly-available DHCPv6 servers could work as well.
> 
> The DHCPv6 client piece in OpenVPN is a few hundred lines of code
> and was not hard to implement. And, if the client needs to do
> something to request, manage and maintain a delegated prefix it
> might as well be DHCPv6.

So what does your patch *do* with the received prefix (since it's 
an out of tree patch I haven't seen yet)?  "Just configure it on the
tun interface" (you do not need DHCPv6-PD for that)?

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email