Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-12.txt

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 29 September 2017 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0FC0132EDA for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ka800L7_5xqZ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x229.google.com (mail-oi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E89FC132A05 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:19:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x229.google.com with SMTP id p187so1424865oif.4 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:19:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=oSt6aUj73NmgVB8UOvUt3045kuuymsQ4+c0l24LlqEU=; b=vRm/bqvm3U+Q6u+O7RlNHqSY7maZiuHX00GZmEagUG6fNBgIW0ssLXLnvQSFXF9SEI wng5YmRUMToJavi3RKBGWPE+G9DGmjMGpPZ/CuQ6YSu3sWrz9AIax39Ladox3qXD7TKu NMJP5wAJH2WGArq93oxVQZkNFvwJcGQjGL0IkkLBK27HVPgJHQk8rT3abs2c7IvntC8p mdhrDMM3yUo9xwcChxfqg2sylvNf7HkCzzhYrLGS/JVsN36ZGtiiUjr4S06Rb2Y9qLNl qpN44m+qTMyPmJac5xs6Mjf25z+aQSGwuJ3wGy/0yLjYcMGkzLqlain9tySLhIi94T7s A8vg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=oSt6aUj73NmgVB8UOvUt3045kuuymsQ4+c0l24LlqEU=; b=fuF9hLNqjbNQGbvoApFLjCJndZzEMPrZ3kdKWy/7n7R5bK16aoh5Nyr1lhRTG8mCT3 g2Bh5pe1x9pqn5uYs58NE5diZkX0lAQck4mtFvnCS6qD2DIxF8xQFZC2/q9uyUpdU02K 4bsS1daA1P3qdBiKUDRmKCL+O00IsIVv1IgB9KCTFqVagsua8CUhxEEMePDtEz88Hxqn DDbasG6+P3UN/nS/1sz1tp7JdYQHbIrcEek7UmWwHbZ8nNox0y7HaFOE6Ib5e2RjZlnh mc2ziEAIhF5ZfhvLvhHahYf51+SWCnuumery7S//k5mnfkGq9x3fpXXwfFmGTATZ8XHW Ixaw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXY1Z29wekWCYhh9jiNcldNdy3qiI8UuxdGEn4r3oLyNtfdEpLN u4YXOmu9LlHEY1PUQkFeaPc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QCyq0yx0hhABhR6il9di1z2sJ7L1XdjHXU7zXJWnA6Ls+TxnFpvQMr9CwvY/l5Io2ltwQDF9Q==
X-Received: by 10.157.15.34 with SMTP id 31mr3374474ott.235.1506719945357; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:19:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8802:5600:e::1238? ([2600:8802:5600:e::1238]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u16sm2441246otc.13.2017.09.29.14.19.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <9C84BB1D-ACA7-4C84-8BBB-E4589FFFD42E@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C5763B28-6CE4-4B60-8D01-264269AD3200"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.1 \(3445.4.2\))
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:19:01 -0700
In-Reply-To: <4C4C203E-894F-4DF0-B8AB-DDABC8930D07@nokia.com>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
To: "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
References: <150667982622.13933.4662167540602943664@ietfa.amsl.com> <4C4C203E-894F-4DF0-B8AB-DDABC8930D07@nokia.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.4.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/ca7lNMdGxSo6vdaOJLiBUpvxipo>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-12.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 21:19:08 -0000

Thanks much. I believe that addresses the issues raised on the list, in IETF LC, and by the IESG - or at least the ones that have been collected in one place.

I'll bet the RFC Editor changes "The authors would like to explicit thank" to "The authors would like to explicit*LY* thank"...

With that, let me ask the working group to give this one last review, ending October 6. After that, Warren, the ball is in your court.

> On Sep 29, 2017, at 3:12 AM, Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com> wrote:
> 
> This latest version includes the suggested text from David Farmer and the fix on “First Hop Router”.
> 
> Kind Regards,
> G/
> 
> On 29/09/2017, 12:10, "v6ops on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org" <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>    A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>    This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Operations WG of the IETF.
> 
>            Title           : Unique IPv6 Prefix Per Host
>            Authors         : John Jason Brzozowski
>                              Gunter Van De Velde
>    	Filename        : draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-12.txt
>    	Pages           : 9
>    	Date            : 2017-09-29
> 
>    Abstract:
>       This document outlines an approach utilising existing IPv6 protocols
>       to allow hosts to be assigned a unique IPv6 prefix (instead of a
>       unique IPv6 address from a shared IPv6 prefix).  Benefits of unique
>       IPv6 prefix over a unique service provider IPv6 address include
>       improved host isolation and enhanced subscriber management on shared
>       network segments.
> 
> 
>    The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host/
> 
>    There are also htmlized versions available at:
>    https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-12
>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-12
> 
>    A diff from the previous version is available at:
>    https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-12
> 
> 
>    Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>    until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
>    Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>    ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
>    _______________________________________________
>    v6ops mailing list
>    v6ops@ietf.org
>    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops