Re: [v6ops] PCP server in draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis

Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Mon, 30 January 2012 19:36 UTC

Return-Path: <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7ED11E8093; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:36:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.562
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.562 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1O+KN6+DQyyt; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:36:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (givry.fdupont.fr [IPv6:2001:41d0:1:6d55:211:5bff:fe98:d51e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832BD11E8081; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:36:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q0UJaEft000156; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:36:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <201201301936.q0UJaEft000156@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:51:52 PST. <85BE2EBF-C8AC-45E1-BF93-1E3066AD3172@apple.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:36:14 +0100
Sender: Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org, pcp@ietf.org, "Ole Troan (otroan)" <otroan@cisco.com>, draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] PCP server in draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:36:24 -0000

 In your previous mail you wrote:

> > UPnP IGD v2 does the job, it was just published after the PCP
> > effort beginning.
>  
>  Was it published under terms that permit IETF to cite it in a
>  standards track document as a normative requirement?  This has, in
>  the past, been a problem with UPnP IGDv1.

=> I am not a lawyer so I can't say... but the text of the standard
is freely available (in all meanings of the word 'free') so at least
one can make its own opinion.

Regards

Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr